Laserfiche WebLink
Tim Moore,Widseth Smith and Nolting,stated that the applicant objects to the use of garages <br /> and closet size as a proxy for transient use.Moore stated that this resort was approved with <br /> covenants requiring transient use and that these are stronger and more direct. <br /> Moore also stated that the applicant objects to the limitations on mooring slips as the City <br /> already has existing regulations regarding mooring slips and why not just use those? <br /> Moore stated that the intent of their proposal to use the density calculations in the DNR's <br /> Alternative Standards(which are also the same as being propos d as new,mandatory shoreland <br /> regulations in the DNRs 2009 draft regulations and are likel ;t e adopted sometime soon)as <br /> well as to match with the current market demand for small n is.They would like to change <br /> the size of units so that they are smaller,there are more but the overall number of <br /> N <br /> bedrooms remains the same. ,{ <br /> t <br /> >SON t{ <br /> Chairman Woog asked for public comments. � I k <br /> Paul Reichenbach providedd copies of the Res6rt web page showing that homes were being <br /> offered for sale with attached garages and large'eltaaets. He noted that this'��being <br /> advertised. He also asked whether clustering of theunits would`still be requi��f the <br /> applicable lake setback is 120 feet a � tether screening w 11 be required alongg e shoreline. <br /> Reichenbach noted a concern that th` �cutting along tie shoreline previously in an illegal <br /> manner and he is concerned with that that it will only get worse. <br /> 1G) <br /> City Planner Oleson stated,that the only%S"t ", sed� 'fwoulde to change the number of <br /> units,that all other requirements would �e m <br /> z- 4r'Y`�'�s7� <br /> Jeff Miller,Widseth Sn�th and Noting,stated; � =� e advertlsing of the twin homes was all in <br /> compliance with what ha;�already been approve e noted that the changes they are proposing <br /> to how allow ensity is,balculat6d will not re s n more bedrooms on the property and <br /> explaine -nosed ulationa would � ° 12.5 percent building coverage in the <br /> first ti 7.5 per the 2nA and 3rd tierk VIi11 noted that impervious limitations will still <br /> be me , ough it wou ` ,ply increase slightly Ern what was previously presented. Miller <br /> stated th e shoreland e left'1n a natural state.What they are trying to do is to re- <br /> arrange wh s already ap ed an not open up any of the other issues,noting that garages <br /> were already ved by the A in their previous approval. <br /> Ann Beaver stated using gos calculations will soon be obsolete and that more modern <br /> standards should be a4 S , � ; ngly encouraged the Commission to look at the entire <br /> Alternative Shoreland ant Standards though—not just the section on how density is <br /> calculated. lug <br /> Scott Pederson asked the applicants if the impervious is changing. <br /> Jeff Miller stated that it may increase,but will still meet the maximum coverage allowed. <br /> Scott Pederson asked if the number of people using the site will change? <br /> Minutes 5 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April 20, 2010 <br />