Laserfiche WebLink
Pursuant to the Pequot Lakes City Ordinance, Section 170.040, the applicant should be prepared at <br /> �. the public hearing to explain the unique hardship for the proposed variance. A hardship is defined <br /> as a condition whereby the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br /> unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute a hardship if <br /> reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. <br /> (1) What are the unique circumstances of the parcel size, shape, topography or other <br /> characteristics that make strict interpretation of the Ordinance impractical? <br /> Our lot is in a pie shade We had enough space for a reasonable site plan before the 2011 changes <br /> in the septic system setbacks. These new changes forced the drainfield further into the building <br /> envelope. The shifting of the drainfield, closer to the road, narrowed the front of the building <br /> envelope considerably. We can change our plans to accommodate the 75 foot setback for <br /> buildings and sewer systems for environmental reasons. The granting of a variance to move the <br /> drainfield 5 feet closer to the property line will not affect the 75 foot setback or have any <br /> environmental effects. The extra 5 feet will allow us to proceed with a plan that will work for the <br /> lot. <br /> (2) How is granting this variance consistent with the intent of the City of Pequot Lakes Land Use <br /> or Subdivision Ordinance? <br /> This variance request will not encroach on the setbacks needed to ensure water quality of <br /> our lakes. The neighboring lot line, where the requested drainfield setback variance is approaching, <br /> has no use or dualities which would be affected variance. <br /> (3) How will reasonable use of the parcel be deprived if the variance is not granted? <br /> Plans to build on our lot have been in the works for 10 years and we were planning to build <br /> in 2012. We have had to change our plans considerably because of the 2011 ordinance changes. <br /> Granting the variance will allow us to build a structure that will have adequate access for people <br /> and vehicles and be attractive to the neighborhood. <br /> (4) What other options, either conforming or non-conforming, have been considered and why <br /> were those options not chosen? <br /> I was not considering asking for a variance to for the 75 foot sewer system setback because I believe <br /> in preserving water duality. We cannot purchase any more footage from the opposite side of our lot <br /> (East) because we need to maintain their building setback. The only alternative is to locate the <br /> drainfield on the West side of the lot <br /> (5) Describe the impact on the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. If <br /> there is no impact,explain why. <br /> There would be no impact. The adjoining lot has buildings, road, well, and septic drainfield <br /> on the opposite side of the neighboring lot. The property line where the variance would approach is <br /> not maintained and consists of underbrush and trees. <br /> 3 REV: MAR 2009 <br />