My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05.03 - Road Vacation
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2012
>
06-05-2012 Council Meeting
>
05.03 - Road Vacation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2014 4:17:08 PM
Creation date
12/17/2013 3:48:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.`. <br />2. Public hearing and notice requirements <br />The city must conduct a public hearing to solicit public input on a proposed <br />vacation prior to granting a vacation. <br />a. Notice requirements <br />Notice of the hearing must be published in the city's legal newspaper and <br />posted at least two weeks prior to the hearing. In addition, written notice of the <br />hearing must be mailed to each property owner affected by the proposed <br />vacation at least 10 days before the hearing. The notice must contain, at <br />minimum, a copy of the petition or proposed resolution as well as the time, <br />place, and date of the hearing. Certified mail is not required by the statute. <br />Unfortunately, the statute does not define who is considered to be an "affected" <br />property owner entitled to notice. The implications of the term "affected" are <br />broader than the term "abutting" used elsewhere in the statute. As a result, the <br />group of "affected" owners comprises a group larger than the abutting owners, <br />but smaller than the general citizenry of the city who will receive published <br />notice of the vacation. <br />Et_ler v. Mondale, t23 The Court has established that when platted streets are vacated, due process <br />N.W.2d 603 (Minn. 1963) re Ull'0S, at minimum that notice be sent to all owners or occu ants of land <br />concerning vacation of plats q � p <br />pursuant to Minn. Stat. § within the platted area. Owners and purchasers of platted land are presumed to <br />sos.ia; Batinich v. Harvey, rely upon access to the areas dedicated to public use in a plat and are deemed to <br />277 N.W.2d 355 (Minn. <br />� t9�9�. be "affected" owners. Cities may adopt a more generous standard as <br />appropriate to their fact situation <br />In unplatted areas, there is no similar guidance from the Court. However, the <br />vacation statute and due process still require the city to send notice to all <br />property owners "affected" by the vacation. Since the term is undefined in <br />statute, the city must develop a reasonable policy regarding notice. The location <br />of the individual street and the character of the surrounding property should be <br />taken into account in determining sufficient notice. <br />� <br />A.G. Op. (June 20, i9as.> An informal Minnesota Attorney General letter stated that, for due process <br />(informal opinion). reaSOriS, it may be prudent to extend the notice requirements beyond fee title <br />owners of property to mortgagees and contract for deed vendors who may be <br />significantly affected by a vacation. <br />VACATION OF CTTY STREETS <br />b. Notice to the commissioner of Natural Resources <br />If the street or any part of the street terminates at, abuts upon, or is adj acent to <br />any public water, written notice must also be served by certified mail upon the <br />commissioner of Natural Resources at least 60 days before the public hearing. <br />After notice is served on the commissioner, at least 15 days prior to convening <br />the public hearing, the city council or its designee must consult with the <br />commissioner to review the proposed vacation. This consultation should be <br />documented by the city. The notice of the hearing and the consultation do not <br />create a right of intervention by the commissioner. The commissioner must <br />provide the city with its evaluation of the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.