My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.01 - Consider Bids for Government Drive Project
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2012
>
04-03-2012 Council Meeting
>
10.01 - Consider Bids for Government Drive Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2014 3:45:39 PM
Creation date
12/16/2013 2:38:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Tim Houle, City Engineer <br />DATE: Apri13, 2012 <br />SUBJECT: Government Drive Rehabilitation Project <br />Attached is a recommendation letter on the two bids the City received for this <br />project. <br />The action requested of the City Council is to Award the project to Tri-City Paving <br />of Little Falls, the lowest responsible bidder, on the basis of the unit prices in their <br />bid proposal. <br />After this, we will work with Tri-City Paving and City staff to obtain bonds and <br />insurance certificates from Tri-City Paving and put together three Contract <br />Documents (one for the City, one for Tri-City Paving, and one for WSN) for the <br />\.. Mayor and Clerk to sign on behalf of the City. <br />There will also be coordination with the DNR as well as with the upcoming <br />summer County project on CSAH 11 / Main Street. <br />WSN recommends the City keep a healthy contingency amount for this project to <br />cover unanticipated costs. One that I have mentioned to the Council before is <br />that after we mill, the thickness or condition of the pavement below this level may <br />be such that we have to remove it and put in aggregate base. That is one reason <br />we bid these projects with unit prices. If we did run into such a situation, or other <br />possibilities, we have unit prices already set and we just increase (or decrease) <br />quantities to account for the actual work needed in the field. Punching in some <br />very rough numbers on the above scenario, we could easily get to $50,000. <br />We realize that the earlier study that looked at a complete reconstruction with <br />streetscape components had an estimated project cost of about $1.5 million. The <br />Council did not want to pursue this and we provided an estimate for a mill and <br />inlay project of a little over $300,000. These bids obviously came in less than <br />even that amount. There are different reasons for these cost differences, but one <br />reason is that Tri-City Paving's bituminous mixture unit price was less than we <br />anticipated ($50/ton vs $60/ton). Another reason is that we went with seeding <br />instead of sod (which, depending on how one deals with different quantities, <br />� could amount to about a$20,000 cost difference / decrease). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.