Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />� <br />City Council Minutes <br />March 6, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />OWNER SINCE THE PROPERTY IS NOT BUILDABLE. COUNCIL <br />MEMBER AKERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 3- <br />0. <br />6.2. Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Update provided by Planning Commission Chair Scott Pederson. Chair <br />Pederson stated that the Planning Commission has been working at <br />answering Council Members Ryan and Akerson's co, erns on the Comp <br />Plan. He stated that the Planning Commission wo #�e. to bring this back <br />to the Council for consideration soon. He reque r���.any additional <br />comments from the Council to be given to the:• ��arii�.fr Commission. <br />Council Member Akerson stated that there: w a co��i'��`��'ttee that was <br />going to meet with Council Member Rya�r��g�rding hisP��cerns, but this <br />did not happen. Chuck Marohn sugg r" ed that City staff c'�`��iinate a <br />committee to meet with Council m, �� �� .rs R ya�,�and Akersor�f��scuss <br />•: �r,,�. �sf .� <br />their concerns. The Mayor agreed tha���s`�aff wa�fici:coordinate,�meeting <br />.,; f�,., . .;... <br />with Council Members Ryan and Akersorr` �f two Planning Commission <br />members along with one s�ff.support pers��`��Qodiscuss their concerns on <br />the Comp Plan. �`��,�'''�`��:�,;,. t�="���}s <br />P r,� « <br />6.3. Sipn Ordinance Discussion <br />Council <br />"I have lorigi��� c <br />specifically as th�� <br />� FF,. <br />cor�����;���rce pt <br />ns and��ri��ier,:ky re <br />-e-,..�,... <br />`�ommission i�``�uri <br />fi��:,;�ity's sign r� <br />coi�``�,�ns and th <br />�;:.�•. <br />and v�s in Pe <br />COUNCIL"`�! <br />CALLS ON � <br />FOLLOWI�G: <br />stated i�`e followi <br />n;rf�rned about�f..}���ity's regulations regarding signs, <br />,�,��lati,��or�s ma�i'�confuse drivers, create hazardous <br />P''t''P,'Y�'•1.* ,j1',•J%.�'li':':�;'��;' <br />�erty o��:��#o make expensive changes to their <br />°i�cf..the rights of property owners. The Planning <br />�F�;.;., <br />nt�f;y�p �; idering an application requesting changes to <br />�tion�:�ihis is an excellent opportunity to address my <br />nce�ns of many property owners, business owners <br />r Lakes." <br />ABER AKERSON MOVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL <br />E PLANNING COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE THE <br />1. AT THE REGULAR MARCH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, <br />MAKE A FORMAL RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL <br />REGARDING THE PENDING APPLICATION ON DIGITAL GAS PRICE <br />DISPLAYS. THE NARROW ISSUE UNDER CONSIDERATION IN THIS <br />APPLICATION SHOULD BE ACTED ON IN MARCH AND NOT TABLED <br />TO A SUBSEQUENT MEETING. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL THEN BE <br />