My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01.05A - Highway 371 - Council Discussion on Road Turnbacks
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2015
>
03-03-2015 Council Meeting
>
01.05A - Highway 371 - Council Discussion on Road Turnbacks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2015 9:18:11 AM
Creation date
2/26/2015 9:17:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
s <br /> > ,pr.‘lo <br /> Lo()"(‘ fre( sc,:ii C0mmuNiacY e <br /> GROWTH <br /> INSTITUTE <br /> Toll Free 866.900.3064 i Fax 866.924.1928 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: December 15,2011 <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Cc: Planning Commission <br /> Re: Comprehensive Plan/Community Assets <br /> At the last City Council meeting,Councilor Ryan made the remark that the City's <br /> roads and streets are a"community asset"that everyone can use and enjoy.While <br /> this is true in a very narrow sense,it overlooks the obvious long-term community <br /> liability this infrastructure eventually becomes. <br /> When a developer builds a new street and then turns it over to the City to maintain, <br /> the City is not getting a"free road"as has been stated in the past.What is happening <br /> is that the public is taking on an asset that has attached to it a long term obligation <br /> for maintenance.We have a destructive habit of looking only at the asset side of that <br /> transaction. <br /> Who is to pay for maintaining all of these"assets"?The answer is that it will be the <br /> property owners of Pequot Lakes that pay the bill or the roads and streets will not be <br /> maintained.And while there is a general belief that improving roads and streets <br /> generates wealth and adds to the overall prosperity, it does not automatically <br /> translate into tax revenue for the City. <br /> If the federal government,state government or a developer comes in,builds a street <br /> for the public and then turns it over to the City to be maintained,we have one life <br /> cycle that is essentially free.At the end of that life cycle,we have to come up with <br /> the money to maintain the street. If it costs$1 million to maintain but only generates <br /> $100,000 of property tax revenue to the City throughout one life cycle,then the City <br /> has to come up with$900,000 from somewhere else to cover that cost. <br /> If you agree with the updated Comprehensive Plan that a key economic development <br /> strategy is to"reduce the tax burden"(page 24),you need to answer the question: <br /> Where will the money needed to maintain the City's infrastructure come from? <br /> Tn7TAnA7 r'nMMTn.T7TVr:Dr1WTL4 remit WARW.STROM:TOWNS.ORO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.