Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Development Committee <br /> August 19, 2008 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> in this area may only require a modification- and not a complete re-working of <br /> the State's permit to the City to operate the spray irrigation field. However, doing <br /> this without a bigger picture plan for the whole spray irrigation parcel would be <br /> shortsighted and could end up costing the City more expense. <br /> 4). To properly look at allowing development to occur on the present spray <br /> irrigation land and thus, to re-locate the spray irrigation facilities or come up with <br /> another method of disposing of the City's wastewater will require a Facility Plan. <br /> This is the name the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency PCA) uses for a <br /> study that looks long-term at major modifications to a s • :stewater system. <br /> 5). A Facility Plan, depending on the alternative -al . and on the MPCA's <br /> review time, can be a year-long process. <br /> 6). Design, obtaining funding assistance . d acquisition, bide d <br /> construction can add on another 2 to . The should be p 9 for a <br /> potential large project in the near or distan 7 • e e to plan fo . <br /> expansion could mean that the City could los- .:i ge tenant. <br /> 7). Although these above time can someti -e compressed, one cannot <br /> wait until we are at 99% capacit I e are far " �:;_ ortunately) or until we <br /> need land next month or next ye. or ec•. exp. r;-ion to begin the Facility <br /> Plan process. It re. ' es some adv.h - anm <br /> 8). Althou• - •e City'- Istewater tr. •tment stabilization ponds and spray <br /> irrigation `e • not yF .pproaching . capacity(currently at about 55%), the <br /> Commission fee • • he be interest of the City to complete the <br /> Fac' ' .ow r. . - than . <br /> 4. •way 371 Up• —Jus• Bolz-Andolshek <br /> Justin -Andols stated that the extension of the timeframe for completing <br /> the High 71 • eject is a detriment to the City of Pequot Lakes. He stated that <br /> the timelin- -en extended to at least 2018-2019 and that it is a waste of tax <br /> dollars to co ue the study especially since the EIS has to be re-evaluated every <br /> 5 years. He her stated that this issue is no longer about the location of the <br /> highway, but about Pequot Lakes being held hostage by MnDOT and basically <br /> being in limbo until we know when the project will take place. He suggested that <br /> the EDC ask the Council to consider not making a decision until MnDOT has a <br /> plan. Discussion was held by the Commission regarding the issue of timing and <br /> the effect on the City. Some discussion was also held regarding the alternate route <br /> versus the through town route. It was the consensus of the Commission to discuss <br />