My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09.2 Joint Road Project Request for Proposal (RFP)
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2020
>
11-10-2020 City Council Meeting
>
09.2 Joint Road Project Request for Proposal (RFP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2021 4:10:59 PM
Creation date
3/8/2021 3:39:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 12 of 19 <br /> <br />Locations <br />The Consultant shall obtain the locations of all utilities that exist within the <br />proposed construction limits and which may be affected by the project. Utility <br />location information shall be obtained directly from the utility owner unless such <br />means is not feasible. All utilities shall be identified as to owner, type, and size. All <br />utilities shall be shown on the preliminary 60% design layouts, topographic survey <br />maps, and tabulated using “Microsoft Excel” by reference to project stationing in <br />accordance with the requirements of the “Utility Notification Law”, Minnesota <br />Statute Section 216D.04. <br /> <br />The Consultant shall contact the utility owners and use all customary procedures to <br />review the existing locations and discuss all utility relocations necessitated by the <br />future project construction as well as any other revisions to the utilities, or <br />installation of new utilities, within the project limits which may be deemed desirable <br />to accomplish in conjunction with the project construction or for which the <br />Consultant has learned will be required in the future. If utilities exist outside the <br />platted right-of-way areas, the consultant shall determine if the utility owners have <br />private easements and gather documentation of said easements. <br /> <br />Conflicts <br />The Consultant shall include all conflicts and required changes to existing utility <br />facilities in the utility tabulation as mention above. If unavoidable conflicts with <br />public utilities are present, the consultant may work with the owner of these <br />facilities, and the City/Township Coalition, to determine an appropriate solution. <br /> <br />Future Plans <br />For informational purposes, the subsurface utility information to be provided in the <br />future final plans will be utility Quality Level C. This quality level shall be <br />determined according to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38.-.2, entitled "Standard <br />Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data." <br /> <br />2.2.3. Detailed Topographic Survey and Mapping <br /> The consultant shall develop a highly accurate network of survey control points <br />throughout the project. Project control shall be tied into multiple off-site control <br />points using MnDOT’s Geodetic Monument Database. This survey should be <br />performed over the full width of the anticipated project corridor including areas <br />outside the corridor where drainage is anticipated to be a hindrance to private and/or <br />public property. For estimating purposes, the consultant shall plan to survey all <br />features within a 75-foot buffer, either side, of the existing centerline alignment. <br />Additional survey work shall be performed in areas of anticipated realignment. This <br />survey should include, but not be limited to the following features:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.