My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
09-01-2009 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:49:21 AM
Creation date
6/18/2014 11:47:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A motion was made by Dean Williams, seconded by Bill Habein, to recommend to the <br />City Council the five times after - the -fact fee, based on the following Findings of Fact: (1 <br />— 6 from June) <br />1. The accessory structures were constructed without a permit; <br />2. Property owner had knowledge of the rules; <br />3. These structures were not part of the original plan granted special fees; <br />4. The special fees did not meet the maximum threshold; <br />5. Staff was informed of the structures through a question and determined they were <br />not permitted structures; <br />6. The structures do meet setback requirements; <br />7. Applicant does admit in his letter dated August 18, 2009 that-he did build without <br />a permit; <br />8. Tom Ryan, who has been knowledgeable with all permits and with City Codes, <br />was an employee of this applicant when these structures were built. <br />Discussion. Number 8 may not be necessary and may deflect reason for <br />recommendation. Mr. Habein withdraws second. MOTION FAILS. <br />A motion was made by John Derksen, seconded by Mark Hallan, to recommend to the <br />City Council the five times after - the -fact fee, based on the following Findings of Fact: <br />(1— 6 from June) <br />1. The accessory structures were constructed without a permit; <br />2. Property owner had knowledge of the rules; <br />3. These structures were not part of the original plan granted special fees; <br />4. The special fees did not meet the maximum threshold; <br />5. Staff was informed of the structures through a question and determined they were <br />not permitted structures; ; <br />6. The structures do meet setback requirements; <br />7. Applicant does admit in his letter dated August 18, 2009 that he did build without <br />a permit. <br />4 AYES; 3 NAYS. MOTHON CARRIES. Mr. Adams will make the request as the <br />Planning Commission Liaison. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />a. Comprehensive Plan Update. <br />The results of the July Workshop are included in the Staff Report. It was the consensus <br />of the Commission to meet one hour early to discuss the Comprehensive Plan update <br />when the Agendas are full. The September meeting will begin at 5:30 p.m. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br />A motion was made by Bill Habein, seconded by Mark Hallan, to approve the July <br />Minutes as read. All members voted "aye ". Motion carried. <br />Minutes 15 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />August 20, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.