My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
09-01-2009 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:49:21 AM
Creation date
6/18/2014 11:47:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commercial zone, but the developer is getting some benefit in coverage, etc. by rezoning. <br />The issue of connectivity is a big concern. <br />Mr. Hallan stated the water main easement should not be an issue. Easements and water <br />mains can be moved. <br />Mr. Marohn stated the Comprehensive Plan talks about Baxter type development. The <br />Grow Zone ordinance amendment is on the agenda later. The Grow Zone type of <br />development creates a sense of place. It will create a public environment saying <br />"downtown ". We think we can take most applications requiring Conditional Use Permits <br />now and grow this area. Moving the building up to the road creates that urban <br />environment. Connectivity adds to that. Physical location helps establish the downtown <br />or urban feel. <br />Mr. Barrett stated they plan to place a monument sign and create their storefront to <br />welcome people. <br />Mr. Marohn stated he would move the building to the front, next to the road. <br />Mr. Hallan stated the developers are using a commercial layout with Downtown Mixed <br />Use requirements. They could obtain more property and do a Commercial layout or <br />expand the downtown use. <br />N1.1 Mr. Pederson explained his comments were based on growth of the Downtown Mixed <br />Use zone, not what currently sets on the site or this project. As far as competition goes, <br />that needs to be put aside. We need to determine if it makes sense to extend the zoning <br />classification; the layout comes after. <br />When asked, Mr. Marohn explained that the Planning Commission has final approval on <br />Variances and Conditional Use Permits. Those decisions can be appealed to the City <br />Council. If the Planning Commission recommends the Rezone tonight, they could act on <br />the other two applications. A recommendation to deny the Rezone would also go to the <br />City Council. <br />Council Member Nagel asked how committed the prospective owner was to the size of <br />the store and the inclusion of gas pumps. Mr. Tucci stated that the operator is committed <br />to the size. There could potentially be a liquor store although the license has not been <br />applied for and would require Council approval. If that space is not liquor, it would be <br />another type of retail space. The gas pumps are an integral space. Council Member <br />Nagel was concerned what this would do to existing businesses. He stated we are not <br />here to dictate private enterprise, but he wanted to know if the operator was committed to <br />size. <br />Chairman Woog stated that a written response had been received in regard to the public <br />hearing, a letter from Don Babinski. Staff was directed to make it part of the record. <br />Minutes 10 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />August 20, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.