My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2009
>
09-01-2009 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning & Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2014 11:49:21 AM
Creation date
6/18/2014 11:47:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that it would be difficult to act on the <br />Conditional Use Permit and/or Variances until the Council makes a decision on the <br />Rezone. <br />A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded by Mark Hallan, to recommend the City <br />Council Rezone these parcels to Downtown Mixed Use. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Habein: NAY; Mr. Adams: AYE; Mr. Derksen: NAY; Mr. <br />Williams: AYE; Mr. Hallan: AYE; Mr. Pederson: AYE. AYES: 4 NAYS: 2. Motion <br />Carried. <br />APPLICANT: Paul Tucci, Oppidan, Inc. <br />Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a grocery store with <br />additional retail space. <br />Mr. Tucci stated he felt issues had been covered. Mr. Marohn had nothing to add. The <br />Conditional Use Permit will be looking at issues of layout with respect to the Downtown <br />Mixed Use zone. Mr. Tucci stated the privacy fence issue and the monument sign will <br />need to be addressed. <br />Public Comment: Kim Bolz - Andolshek, 27546 West Twin Lake Drive: Concerned that <br />the agreement with Mr. Babinski hadn't been finalized with regard to extension of Olson <br />Street. She is further concerned with approving a Conditional Use Permit application <br />tonight if some of these issues are not figured out. Her first concern is safety. There are <br />a few big issues that won't be resolved tonight, such as finalization of the easement. <br />Mr. Marohn stated that the Staff Report reflects there are a number of issues still in flux <br />and based on the testimony he suggests we recess the public hearings we have left on the <br />agenda, the Variances and the Conditional Use Permit, until August 31, the day before <br />the Council meeting, to give the applicant time to come in with one or two approaches to <br />look at. First, negate the need for the Variances and develop the property as a <br />Commercial zone. Second, deal with orientation issues and come back with a plan that <br />dealt with that, the fence, screening, and road easement. That would keep us on track. <br />Chairman Woog stated that it is improper to act on the Conditional Use Permit now. <br />Mr. Williams stated that there were no Findings or Conditions recommended by Staff. <br />Mr. Marohn stated a Commercial plan would work for them. Alter the landscaping plan <br />and there would be no landscaping buffer plan. We could change our recommendation <br />on the Rezone. They could acquire more property to change the impervious coverage <br />issues. <br />Mr. Williams suggested the Design Review Team meet rather than the whole Planning <br />Commission. He also asked the applicant what their timeline was. Mr. Barrett stated <br />they plan to start this fall and get the parking lot in place and build during the winter and <br />Minutes 11 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />August 20, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.