Laserfiche WebLink
M, <br />City Council Minutes <br />August 4, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />that there are many infrastructure costs with high and direct benefit to the <br />project itself but very little benefit to surrounding properties. Council <br />Member Ryan stated that the Council should look at a bigger plan for the <br />City and address the property to the South. He stated that this does not fit <br />the concept of the comprehensive plan in regard to a walking district. This <br />is clearly a highway business and defeats our proposed downtown plan <br />and forces people out of the downtown area. He stated that current <br />business people are held hostage due to the highway until municipal <br />consent on the highway is given. Council Member Ryan stated that to give <br />an indication if the Council is in favor of TIF would cost the City a lot of <br />money. He noted that he would like to see the project flushed out and the <br />planning and zoning issues addressed. <br />Council Member Sjoblad questioned the net affect on the city in regard to <br />jobs. He noted that he has seen the layout and one of the proposed <br />streets looks like it may be a driveway rather than a street or city street. <br />He questioned how this would be an advantage to the City. The proposed <br />water and sewer lines would be private lines and would offer no <br />advantage to the City. Council Member Sjoblad further stated that the area <br />where the building would be elongates the central core of the City. <br />Pat Barrett noted that the south access is proposed to be a City street and <br />would be 44 feet wide. The drive to the north is a private drive but does <br />provide public access to the store. The project will provide 80 to 100 jobs <br />minus the existing jobs. <br />Council Member Nagel stated that there is a clear indication from the <br />comp plan open house that people want a new and expanded grocery <br />store. He noted that he has a concern with the location of the proposed <br />business as it would necessitate an automobile trip. He noted that his final <br />concern is that this is an ethical issue; the use of a financing instrument to <br />aid one player in the market place against another existing player. He <br />noted he is not prepared to move forward with TIF. <br />Mayor Adams stated that 9 months ago the citizens were asked what they <br />wanted in the City. The main answer was that the citizens want a new or <br />expanded grocery store. Mayor Adams noted that a business wants to <br />come to our town regardless of the highway. She noted that the request <br />for TIF is a pay as you go so it does not cost the City any money. She <br />stated that we have a business that wants to come to town and we should <br />give the developer a chance to look into TIF for the project. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: COUNCIL MEMBER MALECHA VOTING AYE, <br />`, COUNCIL MEMBER NAGEL VOTING NAY, COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN <br />