06.01 Planning Commission Report

Home Browse Search

2. The lot widths of the proposed parcels both meet the minimum standard of 500 feet. 3. Both of the proposed parcels meet the minimum buildable area requirements of 5 acres in the Rural Residential Zone. 4. Proposed"Tract A and Tract B"are vacant. 5. The subject property is not adjacent to municipal water and wastewater utilities. Proposed"Tract A and Tract B"contain sufficient space for a primary and alternate SSTS location. 6. There is a wetland located in the northwest corner of subject property. �. The property is suitable in its natural state for the�i�tended purpose and this lot split would not be harmful to the health,safety,vr welfare of future residents or of the community. 8. The applicant is not proposing any provisio�xs for�vater-based recreation. g. The proposed lot layout meets the requireinents of the ordinance. 10.The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the adjacent properry lines. 11. Each of the proposed parcels has at least 33-feet of frontage on public right-of-way on Little Walnut Lane, a 33-foot wide ingress and egress eas�ment. i2.The subject property meets the requirements of the code for stormwater management. �3.There are no public streets proposed within the development. All members voted"aye". Motion carried. c. Metes and Bounds Subdivision- Adam Bitzer, agplicant Mr. Burslie explained the Staff Report. Applicant was present. A motion was made by Plan�ning Commission Member Wilson, seconded by Planning Commission Member Hallan,to approve the Metes and Bounds Subdivision,based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential. 2. The lot widths of the proposed parcels both meet the minimum standard of 500 feet. g. Both of the proposed parcels meet the minimum buildable area requirements of 5 acres in the Rural Residential Zone. 4. Proposed"Tract A and Tract B"are vacant. 5. The subject property is not adjacent to municipal water and wastewater utilities. Proposed"Tract A and Tract B"contain sufficient space for a primary and alternate SSTS location. 6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot split would not be harmful to the health,safety,or welfare of future residents or of the community. �. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. 8. The proposed lot layout meets the requirements of the ordinance. 9. The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the adjacent property lines. 10.Each of the proposed parcels has at least 33-feet of frontage on public right-of-way. MINVTES 22 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission April i8,2oig