My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2019
>
05-07-2019 City Council Meeting
>
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2019 3:02:00 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 3:01:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
looks like. I have no idea, I was around then,but I don't know exactly why we said the <br /> screening requirement or what we were anticipating. We aren't screening our own spray <br /> irrigation field. Someone could object to the rainbows of color by our effluent being <br /> sprayed out there. Your comment is, I think,that some type of screening should be <br /> done. Should it be i00%? No. How do you define l00%? Leaf on? Leaf off? Where do <br /> you go with this? <br /> Vice-Chair Birch stated we don't have an application in front of us to consider. His <br /> Conditional Use Permit does exist. He doesn't have an issue with the statements made <br /> by Mr.Andersen and the conditions on the site,the need for visibility,and all of the <br /> points made were excellent ones. But we are worlang off of what was done in 200�. <br /> There is a process to review this. If Mr.Andersen doesn't feel the CUP is relevant,we <br /> need to go through the application process to get it changed. Then we can have the <br /> conversation with an application that we can act upon. <br /> Planning Commission Member Ha11an stated we don't have the abiiity to aye or nay the <br /> condition. He asked Staff if there is a way for the fee to review the CUP�o be waived. <br /> Staff stated the City Council can waive the fee. He suggested recommencling the Council <br /> to allow the applicant to come back to discuss the one condition with no application fee. <br /> When asked, Mr.Andersen said he would be fine with that. <br /> Vice-Chair Birch asked Mr.Andersen if he had anything to add. Mr.Andersen stated he <br /> doesn't want to drag up old history,but in regards to maturing,he just needs to give it <br /> context. Planning Commission Hallan stated he is an engineer and is anal. Mr. <br /> Andersen stated that with the amount of money it has cost him, and he knew it was <br /> going to cost him at the time,you would have been pretty excited about the situation, <br /> too,that he was faced with and the hardship that was put on him and his family. Mr. <br /> Hallan stated he doesn't know that history. Mr.Andersen stated there needs to be <br /> conte�to those comments. <br /> A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Wilson, seconded by <br /> Planning Commission Member Paulbeck,to recommend the City Council <br /> waive the application fee for Mr.Andersen to amend his Conditional Use <br /> Permit. All members voted"aye". Motion carried. <br /> b. Metes and Bounds Subdivision— <br /> Dan and Lauri Helbling, applicants <br /> Mr. Burslie explained the Staff Report. Applicant was present. <br /> A motion was made by Planning Commission Member Savino, seconded by <br /> Planning Commission Member Larson,to approve the Metes and Bounds <br /> Subdivision,based on the following Findings of Fact: <br /> 1. The subject property is zoned Rural Residential. <br /> MINUTES 21 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> April i8, 2o1g <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.