My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2018 EDC Meeting Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Economic Development (Permanent)
>
EDC Minutes
>
2018
>
10-16-2018 EDC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2019 12:09:59 PM
Creation date
2/11/2019 12:09:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EDC Minutes <br /> October 16,2018 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> • What is it going to cost me? <br /> • What is the procedure to accomplish what I want to build? <br /> These answers need to be available. <br /> Ms. Haverkamp pointed out we also need to have a proposal for smaller <br /> projects, those with a small building and few employees. <br /> Mayor Adams suggested something on the website outlining what we <br /> have for sale in town. Commissioner Holley stated this information <br /> changes often, but could be linked to the MLS. <br /> Mr. Burslie suggested looking at the ordinance to what is allowed in the <br /> Light Industrial zone. <br /> 6. Heart of the Good Life Development <br /> a. Marketing Packet <br /> Chair Jurchen stated the goal was to have final marketing plan ready by <br /> January. He asked the Commission to read in detail prior to the <br /> November EDC meeting. Commissioner Lindholm inquired whether or not <br /> we want to include the infill with this and have one marking piece. This <br /> marketing piece should be a fluid document that changes as variables <br /> change. It was the consensus of the EDC to discuss at the November <br /> meeting. <br /> Council Member Pederson stated including the specifications for both <br /> Commercial and Industrial zones is confusing. Including setback <br /> information that does not apply is cumbersome. Mr. Burslie stated a new <br /> classification for a hybrid of the finro may be necessary. Mr. Burslie stated <br /> the EDC needs to define the types of uses to be allowed and create a <br /> zoning classification to allow those uses. <br /> b. Utilities & Roadway Extensions Study <br /> Commissioner Holley presented a general information packet to determine <br /> a price for these lots. Infrastructure costs are not part of the price. This <br /> discussion will continue at a future meeting. <br /> Mr. Houle explained the revised layout. Early discussions were for 50% <br /> impervious coverage and increasing the impervious coverage to 90% <br /> would increase costs for the pipes and ponds by$300,000. This new <br /> layout also includes examples of subdivision of finro lots into smaller lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.