Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Marohn explained the staff report. Applicant was present, Charles Albrecht, as well <br />as Pat Trottier of Stonemark Land Surveying and Terry Hanson of Nor -Son. Staff <br />recommends approval of this Conditional Use Permit. <br />Entrance would be from the shared driveway with SuperValu. There is a lot of traffic <br />entering and exiting from the SuperValu parking lot and gas station. Mr. Habein stated <br />he was more comfortable with the shared entrance after physically looking at it. Mr. <br />Hanson stated the access easement was set in the SuperValu project. There is <br />considerable stacking exiting the SuperValu lot and it does not allow for any adjustment. <br />MN/DOT wants the existing access to the old DNR building removed. <br />Chairman Woog stated he would rather have the trees left in the right -of -way (ROW). <br />The Crafters Mall needed to leave trees in the ROW. Mr. Hanson stated that MN/DOT <br />wants to have control if they come down or not and whether or not they are limbed. Mr. <br />Hallan stated that it is different if MN/DOT removes the trees than if they allow someone <br />else to remove them. Mr. Albrecht stated they are not asking to remove all of the trees. <br />They want to work with MN/DOT with what they will allow. There are a couple of ugly <br />trees to remove and the lot has trees all around it. <br />Chairman Woog stated that trees have to be removed for the, drive thru. If MN/DOT <br />allows cutting in the ROW then the applicant should replace with additional trees. Mr. <br />Trottier stated that the lot is screened on all 3 sides with red pines, not the east side. It's <br />MN/DOT's call for public safety; it is difficult to see the SuperValu entrance. Mr. <br />Marohn stated that the Planning Commission prefers no trees be removed but defer to <br />MN/DOT if they want to remove some for safety reasons. <br />Councilman Nagel stated MN/DOT historically respects the City's desire to buffer an <br />area. <br />The Planning Commission discussed adding Mr. Marohn's comment as a condition. It <br />was the consensus of the Planning Commission to direct Staff to notify MN/DOT that it <br />is the City's preference the trees be left unless MN/DOT finds there is a safety issue that <br />would warrant their removal. Do not add as a condition. <br />A motion was made by Scott Pederson, seconded by Mark Hallan, to approve the <br />Conditional Use Permit with one condition and the above directive, based on the <br />following Findings of Fact: <br />1. The subject property is zoned Commercial. <br />2. The maximum impervious surface coverage allowed in the Commercial Zone is <br />25% unless increased by the City through a conditional use permit. <br />3. The applicants have submitted a storm water retention plan showing containment <br />of the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm event on the parcel. <br />4. Stormwater will run off the subject property into newly constructed rain gardens. <br />5. The increase in impervious surface coverage is an appropriate conditional use in <br />the Commercial Zone. <br />Minutes 13 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />July 19, 2010 <br />