06 - Planning & Zoning Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Amy Nelson stated that there are stray dogs in the area that could be attracted from the �- scent. Mr. Marohn stated that 60 decibels is a state standard but couldn't say if it was continuous or not over a period of time. This standard has been applied to dog kennels in the past. Sixty decibels is essentially a conversational level at about a meter apart. Public comment closed. The Planning Commission discussed the number of dogs to be out at one time. If allowed, the business needs to survive economically. A boarding kennel for our community would be a good thing; there seems to be a need for one. Conditions could be developed to make this work except for the property values in the vicinity. When asked, Mr. Garland stated he would possibly consider a solid fence. Mr. Habein stated the main concern seems to be noise. On page 4 (b) -3, 2 F he fails to see how noise in this instance can be controlled. The wishes of the residents should be considered because they will be affected and noise cannot be totally controlled. If the applicant can guarantee it, maybe I would change my mind. Mr. Woog stated that the noise is the most difficult issue. Noise is limited by Ordinance; we need to apply the tools so the standards can be met. The only way is to limit the number of dogs outside at any one time. Mr. Garland stated it would be limited to 3, 4 or 5 with a staff person. He also stated that the number may not be known until the kennel is in operation. When asked, Mr. Garland stated that the building will be insulated as they will heat and air condition the building. Mr. Woog stated that there is a mechanism for the City to remedy the noise if the applicants don't meet the Ordinance. Mr. Marohn explained that impaired value is when the value is substantially diminished. The neighbor would need a before and after appraisal by an appraiser. The business is not established; the residents are established. Mr. Pederson stated the use not be injurious to the residents in the vicinity. A motion was made by Bill Habein, seconded by Scott Pederson, to not approve the Conditional Use Permit request for a Dog Boarding/Daycare Business, based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. Adequate measures have been taken or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration, so none of these will constitute a MINUTES 6 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission June 17, 2010