My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7(b) Open Meeting Law - Discussion
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
03-15-2018 Planning Commission Meeting
>
7(b) Open Meeting Law - Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 12:51:13 PM
Creation date
3/8/2018 12:51:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> 2. Attorney General <br /> Minn.Stat §8.07 See index 'I'he Minnesota Attorney General is authorized to issue written advisory <br /> of Attomey General <br /> Advisory Opinions from opinions to city attorneys on"questions of public importance:'The <br /> �993 t°pre�°t. Attorney General has issued several advisory opinions on the open <br /> meeting law. <br /> I. Penalties <br /> Minn Stat.§ 13D.06,suba. Any person who intentionally violates the open meeting law is subject to <br /> 1. <br /> personal liability in the form of a civil penalty of up to $300 for a single <br /> craude v.corr�,�,sis occunence. The public body may not pay the penalty. A court may <br /> N.W.2d 836(Minn.1994). <br /> consider a councilmember's time and experience in office to determine the <br /> amount of the civil penalty. <br /> Minn.Stat.§13D 06,suba. An action to enforce this penalty may be brought by any person in any <br /> o�xeefe v.c�te.,No.ni2- court of competent jurisdiction where the administrative office of the <br /> 0811(Minn.Ct.App.2012) governing body is located. <br /> (unpublished opinion). <br /> In an unpublished decision,the Minnesota Court of Appeals concluded <br /> that this broad grant of jurisdiction authorized a member of a town board <br /> to bring an action against his own town board for alleged violations of the <br /> open meeting law.This same decision also concluded that a two-year <br /> statute of limitations applies to lawsuits under the open meeting law. <br /> M�nn.Stat.§13D.06,s�ba. 'I'he court may also award reasonable costs, disbursements, and attorney <br /> 4.See LMC information <br /> m�o,LMCIT Liability fees of up to$13,000 to any party in an action alleging a violation of the <br /> Coverage Guede,for open meeting law. The court may award costs and attorney fees to a <br /> information about insurance <br /> coverage for lawsuits under defendant only if the action is found to be frivolous and without merit. <br /> the open meeting law. <br /> A public body may pay any costs, disbursements, or attorney fees incurred <br /> by or awarded against any of its members. <br /> Minn.Stat §13D 06,S�a If a party prevails in a lawsuit under the open meeting law, an award of <br /> 4. <br /> reasonable attorney fees is mandatory if the court determines that the <br /> public body was the subject of a prior written advisory opinion from the <br /> commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration, and the <br /> court finds that the opinion is directly related to the lawsuit and that the <br /> public body did not act in conformity with the opinion.A court is required <br /> to give deference to the advisory opinion. <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 13D.06,5uba.4 No monetary penalties or attorney fees may be awarded against a member <br /> (d).Coalwell v.Murray, No. of a ublic bod unless the court finds that there was intent to violate the <br /> C6-95-2436(Minn.Ct.App. p }� <br /> Aug 6,1996)(unpublished open meeting law. <br /> decision).Elseth v.Hille, No <br /> Al2-1496(Minn.Ct.App. <br /> May 13,2013)(unpublished <br /> opinion). <br /> League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 10/16/2017 <br /> Meetings,Motions,Resolutions,and Ordinances Chapter 7�Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.