Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> The best option would be for each councilmember to have an individual <br /> email account that the city provides and city staff manage. However,this <br /> is not always possible for cities due to budget, size, or logistics. <br /> If councilmembers don't have a city email account,there are some things <br /> to think about before using a personal email account for city business. <br /> First, preferably only the councilmember should have access to the <br /> personal email account. Using a shared account with other family <br /> members could lead to incorrect information being communicated from <br /> the account,or incoming information being inadvertently deleted.Also, <br /> since city emails are government data, city officials may have to separate <br /> personal emails from city emails when responding to a public-records <br /> request under the MGDPA. <br /> Second, if the account a city councilmember wants to use for city business <br /> is tied to a private employer,that private employer may have a policy that <br /> restricts this kind of use. <br /> Even if a private employer allows this type of use, it is important to be <br /> aware that in the event of a public-records request under the MGDPA or a <br /> discovery request in litigation,the private employer may be compelled to <br /> have a search done of a councilmember's email communications on the <br /> private employer's equipment or to restore files from a backup or archive. <br /> See Handbook,Records What may work best is to use a free,third-party email service, such as <br /> Mnnagement,for more <br /> information about records gmail or Hotmail, for your city account and to avoid using that email <br /> m��'�t. account for any personal email or for anything that may constitute an <br /> official record of city business since such records must be retained in <br /> accordance with the state records-retention requirements. <br /> H. Advisory opinions <br /> 1. Department of Administration <br /> Muui.Stat § 13.072,subd 1 �e commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br /> (b).See Mmnesota <br /> Department of authority to issue non-binding advisory opinions on certain issues related <br /> Administration,Data to the open meeting law.A $200 fee is reyuired.The Data Practices Office <br /> Practices for an index of <br /> �a�;�ry oP;,,;ons. (DPO)handles these requests. <br /> See Requesting an Open A public body, subject to the open meeting law, can request an advisory <br /> Meetmg Law Advisory <br /> Opmion opinion.A person who disagees with the way members of a governing <br /> body perform their duties under the open meeting law can also request an <br /> advisory opinion. <br /> League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 10/16/2017 <br /> Meetings,Motions,Resolutions,and Ordinances Chapter 7�Page 23 <br />