My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09 Open Meeting Law - Review
Laserfiche
>
Parks
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
03-08-2018 Park Commission Meeting
>
09 Open Meeting Law - Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 1:20:16 PM
Creation date
2/1/2018 1:20:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> RELEVANT LINKS: I <br /> Sce section Q.G.6.fnr more <br /> information about serial The open meeting law does not generally apply in situations where less than �� <br /> m���• a quorum of the city council is involved. However,serial meetings in groups <br /> of less than a quorum thax a,re held in order to avoid the requirements of the <br /> open meeting law may be found to violate the law,depending on the specific � <br /> facts. <br /> � <br /> F. Open meeting law exceptions <br /> Minn.Stat.§13D.01,S�a.s. �e��seven exceptions to the open meeting law that authorize the <br /> closure of ineetings to the public. Under these exceptions, some meetings <br /> M�j n.Stat§ 13D.05,�a.� may be closed and some meetings must be closed.Before a meeting is <br /> closed under any of the exceptions,the council must state on the record the <br /> specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the subject <br /> to be discussed. <br /> �,A�°13�°2 The cornmissioner of the Minnesota.Deparlrnent of Administration has <br /> rna,D ia-o�a. advised that a member of the public body(and not its attorney)must make <br /> the statement on the record.The open meeting law does not define the <br /> phrase"on the record"but the commissioner has advised that the phrase <br /> should be interpreted to mean a verbal statement in open session. <br /> The Fiee Press v.Cowtty oj �e��issioner has also advised that citin the ry <br /> $lue Eanh,677 N.W.Zd 471 � Sj)6Clf C StA.LlltO <br /> (M�,►�.cc A�.zoo4� authority that permits the closed meeting is the sirnplest way to satisfy the <br /> �'°��1°g'f'�a CO1II1n''s requirement for sta.ting the specific unds e <br /> �,«,t m�c u",����;,,g a gro p rmitting the meeting to be <br /> meeting uarler the attorney- closed.Both the commissioner and the Minnesota Court of Appeals have <br /> client priv7ege to discu�v concluded that somethin more s ecific than a eneral statement is needed <br /> � `�ending litigation"did not � p g <br /> satisfy the requirement of to satisfy the requirement of providing a description of the subject to be <br /> �"b'"g�`�'��`�°� discussed. <br /> a►���a�c a�t�a <br /> meeting). • , <br /> Minn Stat§ 13D.05,s�a.� All closed meetings,except those closed as permitted by the attorney-client <br /> ta). privilege,must be electronica.11y recorded at the expense of the public body. <br /> Unless otherwise provided by law,the recordings must be preserved for at <br /> least three years after the da.te of the meeting. <br /> Minn.Stat§ 13D.Q4,s�r,a.s. �e same notice requirements that apply to open meetings also apply to <br /> closed meetings. For example,if a closed meeting takes place at a regular <br /> meeting,the notice requirements for a regular meeting apply.Likewise, if a <br /> closed meeting takes place as a special meeting,the notice requirements for <br /> a special meeting apply. <br /> 1. Meetings that may be closed <br /> The public body may choose to close certain meetings.The following types <br /> of ineetings may be closed: <br /> � League of MinnBsota Cities Irrtortnation Memo: 11/8/2015 <br /> MeeHngs of City Counals Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.