My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-10 - Minutes PL Planning Commission
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2010
>
01-21-2010 Special Council Meeting
>
01-21-10 - Minutes PL Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2014 9:04:18 AM
Creation date
4/17/2014 9:04:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
R <br />MINUTES <br />PEQUOT LAKES PLANNING COMMISSION <br />REGULAR MONTHLY MEETING <br />JANUARY 21, 2010 <br />PRESENT: Tom Adams, Deb Brown, John Derksen, Bill Habein, Mark Hallan, Scott <br />Pederson, Dean Williams and Tom Woog. ABSENT: None. <br />CITY PLANNER: Charles L. Marohn, Jr., PE, AICP <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Dawn Bittner <br />COUNCIL LIAISONS: Craig Nagel and Dave Sjoblad <br />The meeting was called to order by Chairman Woog at 5:34 p.m. <br />ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE- CHAIR: <br />A motion was made by Bill Habein, seconded by Scott Pederson, to elect Tom Woog and <br />Tom Adams as Chair and Vice - Chair, respectively. All members voted "aye ". Motion <br />carried. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISCUSSION — <br />Economic Development Section: <br />Since tonight's discussion will be on Economic Development, Chairman Woog asked <br />everyone in attendance to introduce themselves and explain how their backgrounds may <br />be relevant to this discussion. <br />Mr. Marohn explained this section requires a considerable rewrite. Beginning with page <br />10: <br />Background: <br />Language issues were discussed. There is a statement another Industrial Park needs to be <br />created; there is room to grow in the existing one and there could be a statement that <br />there is potential for build -out. It should maybe be addressed as the Business Park. <br />While we have reduced the lot sizes in the Business Park, we currently have nothing <br />sizable for new businesses. <br />When referring to our commuter -shed the cities listed may be too restrictive. They could <br />be generalized. "Tremendous growth" and "natural revitalization" may need to be <br />elaborated on. <br />Minutes <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />January 21, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.