My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8 Approval of October 9, 2017 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2017
>
11-16-2017 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8 Approval of October 9, 2017 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2017 1:11:57 PM
Creation date
11/9/2017 1:11:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> asked Mr. Schoeb if 25 units is an appropriate number. Mr. Schoeb concurred;that � <br /> I <br /> wouldn't be a problem. '� <br /> I <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan asked if the applicant plans to use the vacant lot I <br /> as is;they are not bringing in any Class 5. Mr. Burslie stated the number of units is not � <br /> a direct correlation to impervious coverage; the applicant does not plan for any � <br /> impervious improvements. 'I <br /> � <br /> Public Comment Opened: <br /> Ken Henke,4239 Pillsbury Street— Mr. Henke stated he has no objection to the change <br /> to include U-Haul rental,but was curious as to why it wasn't there to begin with. Mr. <br /> Burslie explained this use was not part of the existing business and had not been � <br /> included with the original Conditional Use Permit. I <br /> Public Comment Closed. � <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan asked for clarification of Condition Number� <br /> which states parking of trucks and trailers shall be along the north and south property , <br /> lines. The north property line currently is treed and Candition Number 2 states no <br /> existing trees shall be removed. Condrtion 1Vumber 1 should indicate trucks shall be , <br /> parked along the south edge of the existing trees along the north property line. <br /> Planning Commission Member Habein asked if the screening could be shared by the <br /> City,the property owner to the west, and the�pplicant. Mr. Burslie stated the Planning <br /> Commission needs to just review th�s property. We can't require adjacent properties to <br /> screen. This is the time to address the screening for the use on this property. <br /> Mr. Schoeb inquired how many trees per foot are required. There are saplings along the <br /> north property line that could be moeed. Mr. Burslie stated typically there is a planted <br /> height of 6 feet tall within 2 years. There may be twenty 6-foot trees required. Planning <br /> Commission Member Wallin stated the distance along the west property line currently <br /> without trees is i2o feet. Mr. Burslie stated i2 trees would need to be planted. <br /> Mr. Schoeb asked what the timeframe would be to have them planted. Planning <br /> Commission Member Hallan stated we need to allow sufficient time for the planting to <br /> take place, possibly an 8 or g month period. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that Condition Number 4 shall be a <br /> maximum of 25 rental trucks/trailers allowed and Condition Number�shall require a <br /> total of twelve 6-foot evergreen trees shall be planted along the south i2o feet of the <br /> west property line. <br /> MINUTES 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> October�9, 20�� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.