My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12 - City Clerk Monthly Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2011
>
09-06-2011 Council Meeting
>
12 - City Clerk Monthly Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2014 9:58:37 AM
Creation date
3/20/2014 9:53:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />`— ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE <br />AUGUST 16, 2011 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Jurchen, Patrick Smith, Cindy Rieck, Tommy Woog, <br />and Ed Larsen <br />ALSO PRESENT: Mayor Adams; Sandy Peine, City Clerk; and Mike Loven, Public <br />Works Supervisor; Tim Houle, City Engineer; Sheila Haverkamp, <br />BLAEDC; Ruth Ann Hanson, Chamber of Commerce <br />1. Call Meeting to Order <br />The meeting was called to order by Chair Larsen at 8:00 a.m. <br />2. Approval of Minutes <br />MOTION BY MARK JURCHEN AND SECOND BY CINDY RIECK TO <br />APPROVE THE JULY 16, 2011, EDC MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED 5- <br />0. <br />`,, 3. Industrial Park Subdivision Ordinance <br />The City Clerk informed the EDC that the City Council did approve the <br />Ordinance amendment for the Industrial Park Subdivision Overlay District with a <br />3 -2 vote. <br />4. Presentation by Tim Houle on WAC /SAC and ERC <br />The EDC noted that the discussions on WAC and SAC began a few months ago <br />when the EDC was considering incentives to encourage development in the City. <br />The possibility of discounting or forgiving WAC /SAC fees had been discussed as <br />a possible economic development incentive. At that time the EDC had questions <br />about the City's WAC /SAC policy and use of WAC /SAC funds. Upon <br />discovering that the City did not have a WAC /SAC policy or ordinance, the EDC <br />did not feel comfortable suggesting using WAC /SAC fees as economic <br />development incentives without knowing the purpose or use of those funds. At <br />that point the EDC requested more information on the City's water and sewer <br />rates, usage, and capacity. <br />Tim Houle gave a presentation on sewer and water availability charges <br />(WAC /SAC). He explained that currently the City charges $2,150 for a <br />connection to water (WAC) and $7,950 for a connection to sewer (SAC). This is <br />an additional service charge other than the monthly usage charge. This charge is <br />the same amount for a residential connection as it would be for a multi unit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.