My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05.03 Rate Study
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2007
>
11-06-2007 Council Meeting
>
05.03 Rate Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2016 2:08:27 PM
Creation date
11/21/2016 2:08:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Replacement when a City is growing and investing in new infrastructure it can be cost <br /> Reserves prohibitive to customers to simultaneously expand the system and fund its <br /> replacement. <br /> The replacement reserves have been calculated at 90 days of operating <br /> expenses,plus 100% of next year's debt service,plus 100%of the current <br /> year's equipment purchases,plus 100%of the current year's depreciation. <br /> Using this calculation,the water fund generally meets its capital reserve and <br /> represents an average of 10%of the accumulated depreciation balance.The <br /> sewer fund also generally meets its capital reserves and represents an <br /> average of 17%of accumulated depreciation balance. See Exhibit E for a <br /> graph depicting capital reserve requirements and potential cash shortages. <br /> Utility customers typically regard their fee increases for water and sewer in total. The <br /> attached Exhibit A shows the projected combined increase in utility fees and hook-up <br /> fees charges needed to maintain minimum cash balances. <br /> Findings <br /> The recommended connection and user fees do need to increase over time for the <br /> following reasons: <br /> 1) Capital costs have been projected for the sanitary sewer system, with the <br /> expectation of an expansion to the system at some point. <br /> 2) The City has previously agreed to credit the developer a total of$164,563 from <br /> future connection fees for project costs the developer undertook to perform. This <br /> has been split 50150 between the water and sewer fund. <br /> 3) A slow-down in the housing market has slowed the anticipated pace of growth <br /> from the developer's projections. Coupled with the credit described above, the <br /> City is relying on connection fees to pay for roughly 28% of the construction <br /> costs for the treatment plant expansion. Water connection fees represent 10% of <br /> the water distribution system, which includes the Industrial Park area, the hydrant <br /> project and the Highway 371 realignment. <br /> Recommendation #1: Update the rate study at least every 2 years to update capital <br /> projects, monitor trends and adjust rates accordingly. <br /> Recommendation #2: Institute the proposed monthly meter charges shown in order to <br /> provide a funding source for the cost of replacing and maintaining meters. From <br /> discussions with staff, it appears that there is no charge if an existing meter fails and <br /> needs to be replaced. Meters also become less efficient over time and the usage shown on <br /> the meter may not reflect the actual usage. Or, in other words, the charges being <br /> calculated from an old meter may not be accurate. <br /> As was stated above, special assessments were levied for the original industrial park. The <br /> study contemplates an estimate for special assessment revenue. Research and institute a <br /> special assessment process for the Industrial Park area expansion. <br /> 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651)697-8500 Fax:(651)697-8555 <br /> Roseville,MN 55113-1105 http://www.ehlers-inc.com <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.