Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Development Commission Minutes <br />May 17, 2011 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />felt it was important to get information about WAC and SAC fees and a WAC and <br />SAC policy prior to implementing the incentives for small businesses. <br />Discussion was held about the current method of charging for WAC and SAC fees. <br />The EDC questioned why the City does not charge based on a residential equivalency <br />unit. They felt this would be a fairer way than the current method of charging a lump <br />sum, which is the same cost for a residential user and a commercial user. The Clerk <br />explained that when the City had a rate study done by a consultant, one of the <br />recommendations was to adopt a policy regarding utility co tions fees and <br />determine residential equivalent units for different types of�%es. <br />To Do List for the next EDC Meetin! in June: <br />1) Verify existing sewer capacity - Tina <br />2) Verify residential versus <br />3) Determine why the City has not <br />Engineers %b.- <br />3) Develop a survey to use <br />Sheila, Dawn, Sandy <br />itv - Tina <br />acility Plan - Tina, Sandy, <br />sIdina lot subdivisions - <br />4) Develop a AC polic ch will Ike into consideration changing <br />the way the charg r WAC an AC (by using a residential equivalency <br />unit) - Ti , En eers <br />5) sub n pro the Planning Commission at the June <br />nasion in2 - Dawn <br />3 <br />It was the ci <br />provided on <br />adopted. <br />5. Government Drive <br />Phe EDC to Work on a subsidy policy after information is <br />capacity and a policy on WAC and SAC fees has been <br />The Mayor encouraged everyone to complete the survey and return them to City <br />Hall. <br />6. Other Business <br />