Laserfiche WebLink
APPLICANT: Arvig Evergreen LLC. <br /> Applicant requests Preliminary Plat of Evergreen Fourth Addition—Continuation. <br /> Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report. Patrick Trottier, Landecker and Assoc., was <br /> present representing applicant. Mr. Trottier stated that Outlot B will be developed in the <br /> future. The Planning Commission stated that the cul-de-sac cannot be constructed easily <br /> with the contours. Mr. Trottier stated the cul-de-sac will be paved with no curb and <br /> gutter. NPDES and SWPP will be applied for. <br /> A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by Tom Adams, to recommend approval <br /> of the Preliminary Plat, based on the following Findings of Facts: <br /> 1. In reference to the five concerns from the previous preliminary plat proposal: <br /> a. Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 have been removed from the revised preliminary plat <br /> approval and integrated with Outlot B. <br /> b. The road originally proposed on the west wide of the lot has been removed <br /> from the revised preliminary plat and integrated with Outlot B. <br /> c. Lots 1, 2, and 6 have been removed from the preliminary plat and integrated <br /> with Outlot B. <br /> d. Lot 6 has been removed from the preliminary plat and integrated with Outlot <br /> B. <br /> e. The radius of the proposed cul-de-sac has been modified to be 68 feet, which <br /> meets the requirement of the City Ordinance. <br /> f. The proposed road has not been extended to the southerly property line. <br /> 2. The land is zoned Residential, and is suitable for the four proposed residential lot. <br /> 3. The property contains steep slopes and wetlands throughout the property that will <br /> hinder future development in the proposed Outlot A. <br /> 4. Lots 1 and 2 of Block One and Lot 1 of Block Two, would be able to be <br /> developed for residential use without major topographic alteration. <br /> 5. Lot 2 of Block 2 may require some topographical alterations for development due <br /> to the slope. However, the slope would not inhibit all development. Lot 2 has <br /> been expanded from the original proposed to include more developable area. <br /> 6. There is adequate space within the building envelope on each proposed property <br /> for a primary and alternate individual sewage treatment system(ISTS). The soils <br /> are reported to be "Very Suitable" for septic tank and drainfield applications, but <br /> soil borings were not provided and would need to be done prior to septic <br /> installation. <br /> 7. The proposed four lots meet the minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet: <br /> a. Block 1, Lot 1: 58,802 square feet <br /> b. Block 1, Lot 2: 53,902 <br /> c. Block 2, Lot 1: 57,834 <br /> d. Block 2, Lot 2: 83,838 <br /> 8. The four proposed lots exceed the minimum 125 feet of width requirement in the <br /> Residential lot. <br /> 9. The four proposed lots are capable of not encroaching on required setbacks. A <br /> variance would not be needed for construction. <br /> Planning Commission 2 <br /> September 15, 2005 <br />