My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-2015 EDC Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Economic Development (Permanent)
>
EDC Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
07-21-2015 EDC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2016 1:56:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2016 1:56:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
— Relocate <br /> 2, 4% <br /> 9, 18% <br /> ❑ High Likelihood <br /> • Medium Likelihood <br /> ❑ Low Likelihood <br /> 40, 78% <br /> Table 3: Business Risk and Benefits <br /> 215. What level of business RISK do you associate with the Highway 371 expansion along the <br /> —alternate route (bypass) for each of the following categories? <br /> High Medium Low Response <br /> Risk Risk Risk No Change Count <br /> Compensation from MN DOT 9 2 14 34 59 <br /> Increased Traffic 4 1 32 20 57 <br /> Loss of Commercial Property Values 33 9 7 14 63 <br /> Loss of Drive by Traffic 34 8 8 13 63 <br /> Loss of Jobs 22 8 11 20 61 <br /> Loss of Parking 4 7 16 30 57 <br /> Need to Relocate 21 8 9 20 58 <br /> Sprawl 16 9 12 20 57 <br /> Visibility 28 7 10 17 62 <br /> Loss of Business Density 30 7 6 17 60 <br /> answered question 64 <br /> skipped question 2 <br /> NOTE: To interpret the information found in Table 3 use the following example for loss <br /> of commercial property values: 33 of 64 respondents associated a high level of business <br /> risk to loss of commercial property values in the by-pass situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.