06-17-2004 Planning Commission Meeting

Home Browse Search

i • 2. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and related materials has been submitted. 1 3. The number of lots and general layout of lots in the Final Plat conforms to the approved design of the preliminary plat. 4. The applicant has not submitted a title opinion. I 5. No improvements are required for this subdivision. 6. The applicant has not submitted a final plat check. 7. There is no need to post financial security for this subdivision. Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission should develop findings to either approve or deny the final plat. In general, the Commission cannot deny a final plat unless the applicant will not or cannot meet the final platting requirements or the conditions of the preliminary plat approval. The Commission cannot impose additional conditions that do not fall directly within the guidelines of the final plat or relate directly Ito conditions imposed in the preliminary plat. The Commission also has the option to table the final plat to obtain additional t information. Staff Recommendation: Based on the findings of fact in this report, your staff recommends that this application be tabled until the applicant submits a plat check and a title opinion. Your staff has sent a letter to the applicant requesting these materials. If you choose to approve the final plat, we suggest the following conditions be considered: 1. A title opinion acceptable to the City Attorney shall be submitted to the City within 60 days. 2. A plat check shall be submitted to the City within 60 days. IThe Planning Commission may also want to make a recommendation on the park dedication fee. We assume this fee was already paid during the original platting process. If that is the case or if the Commission wishes to give park dedication credit for the designated open space within the PUD, that should be noted. The Ordinance requires park dedication for each plat. I. I t I June 2004 Staff Report Page 7 c