My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2011
>
02-01-2011 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2014 3:34:35 PM
Creation date
3/13/2014 3:32:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
businesses. She asked how high they could be and if there were certain corners preferred <br />�- by the City. <br />Mr. Marohn stated that as long as everyone recognizes the signs are for pedestrians, not <br />cars, site lines and locations can be figured out. We may need to contact the City <br />Attorney on placement. We may need permission to place them on City property, such as <br />right-of-way. County Road 11 is not a City street. They will need to decide ownership <br />of the signs. The City could own the signs and lease the space to the businesses. It may <br />be more economical for private ownership. <br />Mr. Marohn advised them to continue with their plans, find locations and prepare a <br />design and the City will figure out how to make it work. This is what everyone would <br />like to see as long as it is done tastefully. There can be no electronics on the signs. They <br />will need a mechanism to keep them properly maintained and determine if they are going <br />to be private or owned by the City. <br />They were advised to submit a concept of the signs and locations for same af the <br />February Planning Commission meeting. This information will be included in the <br />Planning Commission packets. <br />The Planning Commission returned to the Comprehensive Plan Strategy discussion. <br />Economic Development: <br />It was suggested that the City clarify whether to identify the Business Park as such or as <br />� an Industrial Park. <br />�. <br />Housing: <br />The Planning Commission asked how much of our housing is rental stock. Staff will <br />contact Erika at the HRA to see if she knows. ' <br />Natural Resource5: <br />Recreation: <br />Transportation: <br />Infrastructure: <br />Inspection of individual sewage treatment systems should be all systems, not just <br />shoreline areas. The Wellhead Area should be included also. <br />Mr. Marohn explained that the City Council, the public, other Boards and Commissions, <br />City Staff and whomever would be interested, such as the Business Groups and the <br />Chamber, will be contacted and directed to the site to publish their comments. Those <br />comments will be included in the Staff Report for the next meeting. The City Clerk will <br />be directed to contact the different boards. Mr. Marohn will also contact the newspaper <br />and the radio stations. <br />Minutes <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />January 20, 2011 <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.