Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: EDC Members <br /> FROM: Tim Houle, City Engineer <br /> DATE: August 11,2011 <br /> SUBJECT: WAC/SAC and ERC's <br /> I understand that there is a desire for some education and assistance in <br /> developing a WAC/SAC policy and ordinances. There are various consultants <br /> and resources that the City can use to help them with this, but a defined scope of <br /> work will be important; i.e. what is it you really want and how are you going to get <br /> there? <br /> While there are definitely other components (legal, engineering, administrative, <br /> etc.) involved, one way to look at this is as a financial exercise. So, first, let's go <br /> e., through some big picture numbers to help us get an overall sense of where the <br /> City is at. <br /> We can then discuss what you really want and some of the steps we need to get <br /> us there (this can be the basis for a Request For Proposal — RFP — if you want to <br /> recommend the City Council go out with one). <br /> Acronyms: <br /> WAC —Water Availability Charge <br /> SAC — Sewer Availability Charge <br /> ERC — Equivalent Residential Connection (also sometimes referred to as an <br /> ERU — equivalent residential unit— or EDU —equivalent dwelling unit) <br /> The number of ERC's (i.e. the average water used, or wastewater produced, <br /> from a residential unit) for a building or parcel is generally the method used to <br /> determine the WAC and SAC for that building or parcel. <br /> Justification for WAC and SAC varies from city to city. According to the League of <br /> MN Cities, WAC and SAC fees may be set to cover the eventual costs of <br /> improvements to local water and wastewater infrastructure including <br /> construction, reconstruction, repair, or enlargement of the system. <br />