Laserfiche WebLink
1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br /> 2 INTENT <br /> 3 Have a well-balanced local economy that builds on Pequot Lakes' existing business community, attracts outside <br /> 4 investment, encourages entrepreneurs, promotes the creation of diverse jobs and serves the consumer and <br /> 5 service needs of Pequot Lakes' residents and the surrounding neighborhoods. Pequot Lakes is a well-established <br /> 6 community. Growth is needed to avoid stagnation and the city needs to get a higher ccturn utilization on public <br /> 7 investments by encouraging development within the existing infrastructure. <br /> 8 BACKGROUND <br /> 9 The railroad stop was the original catalyst for economic growth in Pequot Lakes. Businesses established within <br /> 10 walking distance of the station and were then surrounded by neighborhoods built on the traditional grid system of <br /> 11 the time. As transportation switched to the automobile, highway-oriented development began to be established <br /> 12 along the main roads in and out of town.Most of this was commercial in nature with a uniquely small-town flavor. <br /> 13 In time,a business park was established off of the highway to provide for more intensive commercial and industrial <br /> 14 operations within the City. In the years since the Comprehensive Plan was last updated, these three areas have <br /> 15 continued to mature in distinct patterns. <br /> 16 Business Park <br /> 17 The growing capacity within the community provided an opportunity for Pequot Lakes to establish a business park <br /> 18 using a grant and loan package from the Federal government. Although slow to establish at first, the park has <br /> 19 gradually expanded as local businesses have relocated for more space and new enterprises have opened. The <br /> 20 industries in the park provide the area with a degree of economic stability that comes with having year-round jobs <br /> 21 and products that are exported from the area. In 2008,the City modified its land use regulations to provide more <br /> 22 development flexibility within the park (smaller lots and increased coverage limits)to get higher utilization out of <br /> 23 the existing infrastructure investments and entice development of the remaining undeveloped properties. <br /> 24 An analysis of the industrial park investment(See Appendix)demonstrates that the park could not have been built <br /> 25 I without significant assistance from the federal government, through a rural utility. This has some dramatic <br /> 26 implications for both future expansion and the ongoing maintenance of the existing park.To expand the park with <br /> 27 near-term tax revenues would require significant additional federal investment,which is uncertain to happen.And <br /> 28 as the park ages and the infrastructure requires more maintenance, there is the very likely possibility that it will <br /> 29 cost more to service the park than it generates in tax revenue.To ensure this does not happen,the development <br /> 30 pattern in the park needs to evolve to be more efficient, and expansion options need to be minimalist (without <br /> 31 major infrastructure)or put on hold until the imbalances in the current park are corrected. <br /> 10IPage <br />