Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />City Council Minutes <br />July 23, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />-------------------------- <br />2B. Sprinqsted Presentation of Urban and Rural Taxinq Districts <br />Paul Steinman from Springsted Incorporated gave an overhead <br />presentation based on a three year phase-in period. Mr. Steinman <br />explained that the purpose of the study was to analyze the phasing <br />together of urban and rural tax rates, measure impact to residents on the <br />City portion of taxes based on property tax classifications, and to complete <br />the phasing over a multi year period. Mr. Steinman stated that the <br />presentation is based on the assumptions that the tax rates equal in three <br />years, that the levy remains stable, and that the taxable market values and <br />net tax capacities remain stable through the phasing period. Mr. Steinman <br />presented three resulting impact scenarios for rural taxpayers and urban <br />taxpayers. <br />2C. Citv Attornev Review of the Process <br />Clyde Ahlquist discussed the City's authority to repeal the orderly <br />annexation resolution. Mr. Ahlquist stated that the City has the power to <br />create ordinances and make ordinance amendments. Therefore, per <br />� Minnesota Statute 272.67 subdivision 1, the urban service district and <br />rural service district may be changed in the same manner that an <br />ordinance or amendment is changed with a majority vote of the City <br />Council. Furthermore, Minnesota Statute 272.67 subdivision 2, states that <br />by amendment of the ordinance the benefit ratio may be changed and <br />lands may be added or removed from the rural service district. Therefore, <br />the City Council has the authority to repeal the service districts entirely <br />and equalize the tax rates. <br />2D. Open Public Hearinq <br />Mayor Adams opened the public hearing and stated that the City Council <br />was here to listen and that no decision by the Council will be made at this <br />time. <br />David Kennedy, 29064 Voyagers Pass, Pequot Lakes — Mr. Kennedy <br />stated that he owns properties in both the urban and rural service districts <br />and that Sibley Township would have remained a separate entity if they <br />knew this tax equalization would occur. He noted that the preservation <br />and protection of the rural atmosphere is valuable and that this is less <br />about reducing the unfair tax burden of the urban property owners as <br />much as it is to remove the limitation that exists in taxing rural properties. <br />� Mr. Kennedy is opposed to the phase-in proposal. <br />Curt Cogan, 31368 County Road 112, Pequot Lakes — Mr. Cogan stated <br />that he is an original resident of Sibley Township and that he made a <br />