My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-15-2012 EDC Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Economic Development (Permanent)
>
EDC Minutes
>
2012
>
05-15-2012 EDC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2016 2:36:49 PM
Creation date
9/30/2016 2:36:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE <br /> MAY 15, 2012 <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Jurchen, Cindy Rieck, and Tommy Woog <br /> MEMBERS ABSENT: Ed Larsen, Patrick Smith <br /> ALSO PRESENT: Sandy Peine, City Clerk; Sheila Haverkamp, BLAEDC; Jenna <br /> Crawford, Chamber of Commerce <br /> 1. Call Meeting to Order <br /> The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Jurchen at 8:00 a.m. <br /> 2. Approval of Minutes <br /> TOMMY WOOG MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 17, 2012 EDC <br /> MINUTES. CINDY RIECK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION <br /> CARRIED 3-0. <br /> 3. Business Park Lot Discussion <br /> 4. Small Business Subsidy Policy <br /> 5. WAC/SAC—Proposal from Tim Houle <br /> The EDC discussed agenda items 3, 4, and 5 simultaneously. <br /> The City Clerk and Sheila Haverkamp gave an update on a company who has <br /> requested to purchase property in the City's business park. The Clerk informed <br /> the EDC that the business owner has asked what incentives the City has to offer to <br /> his business. The EDC indicated that this is the reason that a small business <br /> incentive program is necessary for the City as it is better to be prepared than to <br /> have to react. The EDC discussed possible business incentive opportunities such <br /> as City fees which could be forgiven, financed etc. The EDC felt that there should <br /> be different incentives for specific geographical areas such as the Business Park <br /> versus the downtown are in order to drive growth in the specific areas. <br /> The EDC discussed the need for a rate study and SAC/WAC policy which would <br /> include basing usage charges on equivalent residential units (ERU). The EDC <br /> noted that the current rates are unfair as the residential users are subsidizing large <br /> water users. The EDC members felt it would be best to draft a letter to the <br /> Council explaining the importance and urgency of the need for a WAC/SAC <br /> policy or ordinance based on an ERU. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.