My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07B - Lakes Stae Bank Sign Permit
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
04-21-2005 Planning and Zoning Meeting
>
07B - Lakes Stae Bank Sign Permit
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2016 11:35:07 AM
Creation date
7/28/2016 11:35:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7b. Lakes State Bank Sign Issue <br /> Lakes State Bank has submitted an updated request for a sign. This was done based on <br /> the advice provided in the email excerpted below: <br /> (Written on March 21, 2005 to Justin Bolz Andolshek and Lakes state Bank) <br /> Let me provide a little bit of clarification for this. <br /> It is absolutely clear that if the sign is 12 feet high or less AND each side of the sign does not <br /> exceed a total area available for signage of 64 square feet, that we can issue an over the counter <br /> permit without any question. We can do that right now and would be very happy to do so. <br /> If we get into a nuanced definition of what is sign area-is it the rectangular part of the sign or is it <br /> only the area of the lettering-we are not going to be able to resolve that without going to the <br /> Planning Commission. It would seem right now that their consensus would be to compute sign <br /> area the same way the sign company does, which would make the proposed sign too large by <br /> quite a bit. There was not 100% agreement on that, however. <br /> If you go over 12 feet, again there is some ambiguity. There was a temporary ordinance that was <br /> adopted a few years ago but likely thrown out as part of the motion to adopt other ordinances. <br /> With the merger it is unclear, which is why we are working so hard to get the updated ordinance <br /> adopted. The temporary ordinance would have allowed signs as high as the building. The <br /> Commission did not appear to want to go that direction. <br /> The new ordinance will provide for a sign that is 15 feet high, but the total sign area allowed is cut <br /> in half. The discussions that were had in developing this ordinance centered around providing for <br /> a decent amount of signage for everyone but resisting having any one sign dominate any other. <br /> The P&Z Commission did not want to see a sign war with each new sign getting comparatively <br /> bigger. There is a provision in the new ordinance, however, to allow for flexibility at the discretion <br /> of the Planning Commission where a unique situation presents itself. I do not have any guidance <br /> as to whether they would consider this a unique situation. <br /> So it seems you have three courses of action: <br /> 1. Get a permit today for 12 feet or less and 64 square feet of area. <br /> 2. Go back to the Planning Commission with a different plan, probably lower than 16 <br /> feet and with less sign area or the result will likely be the same. <br /> 3. Wait for the new ordinance to be approved-hopefully in April or May. <br /> Go ahead and contact me if you want to discuss this more or have any other questions. <br /> -Chuck Marohn <br /> City Planner <br /> 218-828-3064 <br /> The new sign is proposed to be constructed with 64 square feet of sign area per side and a <br /> total height of 14 feet. Architecturally the sign is much less imposing-it strikes a <br /> narrower profile and the height will blend in with the surrounding area. The Planning <br /> Commission has the latitude to interpret the Ordinance to provide for this sign as an over- <br /> the-counter permit. That is the recommendation of your staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.