Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM #8.4 <br /> REPORT TO <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> Date: November 9, 2004 <br /> Subiect: Audit Proposals <br /> Report: Proposals are attached. We received audit proposals from three firms: <br /> Mathias C. Justin, KDV, and LarsonAllen. <br /> Two of the three audit proposals quoted two audit methods to leave options open in <br /> dealing with GASB34. <br /> The City is currently required to do an accrual audit according to government standards. <br /> The reason for this type of audit has to do with a requirement of a Rural Development <br /> loan the city has through the USDA for the water tower. Without this requirement, the <br /> City would be able to do a cash basis audit,which would be less expensive and the City <br /> would not be required to meet the GASB34 requirements by the end of this year. <br /> There is a chance that the City could do a cash basis audit if we get a letter of <br /> authorization from the USDA. I have been in contact with the USDA office and they <br /> have indicated that they will consider our request,but offered no promises. <br /> Because GASB34 must be completed by the end of this year if we do not switch to a cash <br /> basis audit, I recommend that we budget for the accrual basis audit in case we do not <br /> receive authorization from the USDA. <br /> Staff feels that a different auditor may be able to provide a fresh look at the financial <br /> picture of the City. I have talked to the Deputy State Auditor about what the City <br /> expectations should be from an audit. She indicated that the City should request a <br /> management letter which would provide recommendations on how to improve operations <br /> and look at trends such as how to plan for future infrastructure expansion. <br />