Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO <br /> Date: August 4, 2004 <br /> To: Sandy Peine, City Clerk <br /> Dawn Bittner,Zoning Administrator <br /> From: Chuck Marohn <br /> Re: 2005 Budget <br /> To prepare a budget for 2005,I took a look at where we are for the first half of 2004. <br /> The attached sheets show the budget that was part of our proposal. We are running$800 <br /> under that budget. A breakout of each activity by date is also included that shows just <br /> how we got to this number. <br /> Everyone knows we have had extra expenses that were not planned or budgeted for. <br /> Those include the following: <br /> Babinski—$884 <br /> Comp Plan Special Meetings—$513 <br /> TH 371 - $499 <br /> Misc- $171 <br /> Obviously none of these expenses are recurring, with the possible exception of Babinski. <br /> All items for Babinski are directly reimbursable from Babinski under provisions of the <br /> Ordinance. <br /> In 2004, we budgeted$9,500 for the East Twin Lake Plan. We(Community Growth <br /> Institute) are running a little ahead of our budget, but that is our problem and not yours. <br /> You will not be billed more than$9,500 for work on this project. <br /> In 2004,we also budgeted$4,000 for preparing a draft land use and subdivision <br /> ordinance. To date,we have billed$1,539 of this. We anticipate that $4,000 will be <br /> sufficient to get draft ordinance completed and review by the Planning Commission. <br /> How much review time the Council will take is, of course,the unknown expense, but I <br /> have some ideas during the draft phase to hopefully limit the number of issues the <br /> Council may have. <br /> We have had an extra$3,100 in expenses associated with the Comprehensive Plan <br /> review. This includes the special meetings(not official city meetings)and editing of the <br /> plan. <br /> For 2005, I would propose one of two approaches. The first approach is to contract the <br /> \.. same way that we have for 2004,that is hourly for planning services. Our reduced(25%) <br />