My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12.05 TIF and Ehlers
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2004
>
02-03-2004 Special Council Meeting
>
12.05 TIF and Ehlers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 11:47:33 AM
Creation date
7/19/2016 11:47:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a. District 1-9: The Developer Agreement or TIF Note in the City files is not <br /> signed. There was documentation of the developer's expenditures on file. <br /> The Developer may have an executed copy of both that he may be willing <br /> to provide for our records. If not,the Developer Agreement and TIF Note <br /> need to signed be as soon as possible. <br /> b. District 1-4: There was no signed TIF note in the files. <br /> We have contacted Briggs and Morgan, your TIF attorney, to request that they <br /> review their files for this documentation. They do not have any additional <br /> documentation. <br /> 7) District 1-8, 1-10 and 1-11 include parcels that are in the industrial park that <br /> was originally District 1-3. The City bought land in the industrial park. A <br /> Rural Development Loan was issued to finance the infrastructure in the original <br /> District. District 1-3 has since been decertified. The following issues need to <br /> be resolved with respect to the industrial park project. <br /> a. Interfund loan resolutions need to be passed for the land write down <br /> for Districts 1-8 and 1-10. The City is repaying itself for the cost of <br /> the land. Your auditor will need to set up the obligation according to <br /> the resolution. <br /> b. District 1-8 and 1-10 appear to be transferring increment for <br /> administration costs incurred. There needs to be documentation on file <br /> to support an amount. The payments need to be monitored so <br /> payments are not made in excess of the documented costs incurred or <br /> in excess of the 10% admin allowance allowed by law. <br /> c. The developer agreement for District 1-11 anticipates the project to be <br /> completed in phases. The city should be aware that if and when the <br /> developer is ready to proceed with Phase II,that the project needs to <br /> be in accordance with the existing development agreement. <br /> We recommend the following: <br /> 1) Examination of the Industrial Park project to verify the sources and uses of <br /> funds,where the revenue and expenditures have been coded, and an analysis <br /> of the future sources and uses of funds. There may be an opportunity to <br /> utilize tax increments for the rural development loan payments. <br /> 2) Recreate and verify all the Developer payments. In order to assure that the <br /> payments have been calculated appropriately, it is necessary to review the <br /> increments received from the county and all the payments made to the <br /> developer. <br /> 3) Organize the City's TIF records to allow for monitoring of compliance to the <br /> TIF law. Create a Tax Increment District Summary or abstract that outlines <br /> the major issues in each of the TIF Districts. <br /> 4) Ehlers and Associates provides, at no charge, a TIF Basics workshop for our <br /> clients. If the council would find a session like this helpful,we would be <br /> available to conduct a workshop.__ <br /> 3060 Centre Pointe Drive «Phone» Fax:(651)697-8555 <br /> Roseville,MN 55113-1105 «Email_Address» <br /> http://www.ehlers-inc.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.