My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Item 10.2 - PSN Service Agreement
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2013
>
11-05-2013 Council Meeting
>
Agenda Item 10.2 - PSN Service Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2014 3:06:29 PM
Creation date
1/27/2014 3:32:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The following are responses from the cities of Albertville, Annandale, and Maple Lake regarding their <br />experiences with Payment Service Network. <br />Citv of Albertville: <br />1. We take a1l payment from PSN, the majority is Uti(ity bills, then residents can pay for their <br />permits, but the dollar limit on permits is under $1,000. I don't want builders using credit cards <br />to pay the permits. <br />2. Our customers seem very satisfied with PSN <br />3. We have been very happy with their service, I know when we caN for something customer service <br />is great <br />4. Imp(ementation went well, we had no major issues. I worked wrth PSN for 6 months before we <br />implemented assisting them in the process of what needs to be written in the program to work <br />flawlessly with our utility software. <br />5. We have been using PSN, live, for 2% years <br />6. We use Banyon, and we used to use Revtrak. When we went with PSN we went from processing <br />$11,000 in e/ectronic payments via the internet (not ACH we do that internally) to $49,000. We <br />no longer get those checks from the bank where people pay via fiheir financial institution, those <br />f/ow through PSN now. We do not use their e-bill because i can send e-biils free through <br />Banyon. It was a good switch to PSN. <br />Citv of Annandale: <br />We receive credit cards payments processed on the terminal, through our websrte, and through <br />autopay. We a/so received payments that are processed through bank pay if the bank it set up to <br />do that. We use to get 30+ payments from banks for customers thaf use bank pay. It is now <br />down to 2. It was a great improvement and we are very happy with the service. <br />1. Our customers are very satisfied with the service. We currently have 25% of our customers <br />that are participating in the autopay. This number does not include fhose that are coming in and <br />pay with credit card or logging into our website and paying that way. We implemented the auto <br />bi!l about 2 years ago and that is going very well also. People are electing to receive their bill <br />electronically instead of a paper bill. We don't have 25% on that but every week we have more <br />people signing up. <br />2. PSN customer service is very good. Anytime we have had an issue they will get back to us <br />within 24 hours. If we have an urgent issue they work wiih us qcrickly fo get the issue resolved in <br />a timely matter. PSN has worked with our accounting software to get some of our issues <br />resolved. One ihing that was unique to our City was we set our renta! properties up in the owners <br />name and put the renter as a tenant on that account. It got unique in the fact that we actually <br />have two cusfomers for the same account number. PSN worked with our software people to get <br />this option up and running so that either the renter or the owner could go online and make a <br />payment. <br />3. The implementation process went well. We started out with processing payments here on the <br />terminal. After a few months we then went to putting the link on our websrte so people could go <br />out and make their payment that way. Our last integration was the autopay. Every step went <br />smoothly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.