My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2012
>
12-04-2012 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2014 2:19:05 PM
Creation date
1/22/2014 1:53:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. The lot area of the proposed lot exceeds the minimum buildable area of 10,000 <br />�— square feet. <br />4. All of the existing structures on the proposed lot meet the setback requirements of <br />the Commercial Zone. <br />5. The proposed lot is served by the municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. <br />There is not a need for extensions for the proposed development. <br />6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot <br />split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or of <br />the community. <br />7. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water-based recreation. <br />8. The proposed lot layout is compatible with the existing layout of adjoining <br />properties and the proposed lot lines are parallel and perpendicular to existing lot <br />lines. Future development will not be constrained by the proposed lot layouts. <br />9. The proposed side lot lines are at right angles to the existing road line and the <br />property lines of the adjacent properties. <br />10. The property contains more than the 33-feet of minimum frontage on public right- <br />of-way. <br />1 l. The subject property meets the requirements of the code for stormwater <br />management. There is not a proposal to increase impervious surface coverage. <br />12. There are no public streets proposed within the development. <br />All members voted "aye". Motion carried. <br />� <br />APPLICANT: Steven and Ruth Quisberg <br />Applicants request Final Plat of SuperValu Addition to Pequot Lakes <br />Mr. Burslie explained the Staff Report. The Final Plat acknowledges all the conditions of <br />Preliminary Plat have been met; since there w�ere no conditions to the Preliminary Plat, <br />the Planning Commission needs to make a recommendation to the City Council to <br />approve the application. We still need to receive the Title Opinion from the attorney and <br />the plat check. Those items will be submitted to Staff prior to the Council meeting. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT: None. <br />A motion was made by Bill Habein, seconded by Wesley Wilson, to approve the Final <br />Plat of SuperValu Addition to Pequot Lakes, based on the following Findings of Fact: <br />1. The applicant has complied with all of the conditions of the conditional use <br />permit. There were no conditions of the preliminary plat approval. <br />2. A plat check for the development has not been submitted to the City. <br />3. The City Attorney has not indicated that adequate title insurance has been <br />provided to assure all parties with an interest are represented. <br />4. There are no required improvements with this subdivision. <br />5. An independent land surveyor has not verified that the final document meets the <br />statutory requirements. <br />6. No fnancial security is required. <br />� <br />Minutes 3 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />November 15, 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.