My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09.02 - Administrative Fines
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2006
>
05-02-2006 Council Meeting
>
09.02 - Administrative Fines
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2016 2:05:45 PM
Creation date
7/6/2016 2:05:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Xonorabla Stevie Smith <br /> December 1,2003 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield, 274 Minn. 347, 352, 143 N.W2d 813, 816-17 <br /> (1966)(citations omitted). <br /> In evaluating whether an area of law has been preempted by the legislature, the courts <br /> will consider: (1)the subject matter regulated, (2)whether the subject matter is so fully covered <br /> by stau law that it has became solely a matter of state cancers;(3)whether any partial legislation <br /> on the subject matter evinces an intent to treat the subject matter as being solely a state concern; <br /> and(4)whether the nature of the subject matter is such that local regulation will have an adverse <br /> effect on the general state popubation- See Mangold Midwest at 359,243 N.W.2d 813,820. <br /> Third, both statutory and charter cities have substantial authority to enact regulatory <br /> ordinances, see, e.g., Minn. Stat. §412.221 (2002), and to fix penalties for violations.-See,e.g., <br /> Minn,Star §412.231 (2002),which provides: <br /> The council shall have the power to declare that the violation,of any ordinance <br /> shall be a penal offense and to prescribe penalties therefore. No such penalty shall <br /> exceed a fine of$700 or imprisonment in a city or county Jail for a period of 90 <br /> days,or both,but in either case the costs of prosecution may be added. <br /> Fourth, the legislature has,however,prescnbed in detail the procedures for prosecution of <br /> penal offenses. For example,Minn Stat. §487.25,subd. l (2002)states_ <br /> Subdivision 1. General. Except as.otherwise provided in sections 487.01 to <br /> 4417.38 but subject to the provisions of section 480.059 [Supreme Court <br /> authorized to promulgate rules governing criminal procedurej,pleading,practice, <br /> procedure, and forms in actions or proceedings charging violation of a criminal <br /> law or a municipal ordinance, charter provision, or rule are governed by the rules <br /> of criminal procedure_ <br /> (Emphasis added). Subdivision 10 of that section allocates the authority and responsibility for <br /> prosecution of various offenses. In general, city ordinance violations,petty misdemeanors, and <br /> misdemeanors occurring witbin a city must be prosecuted by city attorneys, while felonies and <br /> most gross misdemeanors must be prosecuted by county attorneys. Minn. Staff. § 487.25, <br /> subd. 10(2002). <br /> With the above principles in mind,we tum your specific questions. <br /> I. Given the extent and detail of legislation addressing statutory criminal offenses <br /> and prosecution procedures set forth in Minn. Stat.chs. 169 and 609 tbrough 634, it is clear that <br /> the stare has preempted the field with respect to the offenses and procedures defined in those <br /> statutes. Consequently,while cities are empowered to regulate conduct in areas of local interest <br /> and to supplement statutory regulations in many areas, cf., Hannan v. City of Minneapolis, <br /> 623 N.W.2d 281 (Minn. Ct. App.2001),they may not,in our view,redefine the nature or level of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.