Laserfiche WebLink
The downtown planning process takes its lead from the Comprehensive Plan, which it is <br /> designed to supplement,not supplant. <br /> • Who produced the cost estimates in the back of the report? Right now they just hang out <br /> there. We need some clarity on their source. <br /> Staff, in consultation with the City Engineer's office, developed the cost estimates. As a <br /> visioning process and not a technical report, the detailed calculations that went in to creating <br /> the estimate are not included in the report. While the cost estimates themselves reflect a general <br /> estimate of the effort needed, an engineering feasibility study is going to be needed for <br /> preparation of cost estimates necessary to authorize a specific project to begin. The City is <br /> currently considering improvements to Government Drive and the City Engineer has presented <br /> a proposal to do a feasibility study, accommodating the concepts developed in the downtown <br /> visioning process. <br /> • The whole report needs harder analysis. The Commission seemed to feel the document was <br /> too high in generalities and not enough in terms of specifics. <br /> While we are happy to provide any reasonable and relevant specific information requested by <br /> the Planning Commission, it is important to remember that the plan is a visioning document <br /> that builds on the Comprehensive Plan,not a technical engineering report. <br /> There is need for more funding options. Your report states 4 but what other options exist. <br /> Laying off 50% of the funding on the directly affected businesses seemed a bit stiff. For instance, if we <br /> sell some land to MNDOT for a bypass couldn't those dollars be used to offset downtown infrastructure <br /> costs?? <br /> The direct assessments approach is critical for the projects success, and those reasons are <br /> explained in detail on page 22 of the text report. It is important to understand that the project <br /> encompassed an area much larger than the property occupied by the existing businesses in <br /> town. Most of this area is undeveloped or underdeveloped. A direct assessment is important to <br /> ensuring the future and timely development of those properties. <br /> It also states on page 22 that it would not make practical sense to assess the existing businesses <br /> (reference is made to Government Drive specifically, but the same principles apply to most of <br /> the existing businesses)both for economic and legal reasons. <br /> While there may be more funding options, these were the ones that were discussed amongst <br /> project participants and, in the opinion of Staff, these are the strategies that present the most <br /> realistic scenario for moving forward. <br /> • What is the % of vacant businesses in the downtown area and how does that compare to other <br /> towns of somewhat similar size. For example, if we have a 20% vacancy rate that may or may not be <br /> bad. If it compares to a 30% vacancy rate elsewhere maybe we are doing okay. Right now we don't <br /> know. <br /> While this is interesting information,it is not part of the study or really relevant to the outcomes <br /> presented. The vacancy rate in downtown Pequot Lakes is a constantly changing and evolving <br /> thing. That will be true in even the most successful and vibrant downtown area. The concepts <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 13_2 <br /> December i4,2oo6 <br />