My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rezoning in the Rural Residential District to the Rural Residential Classification
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
12-14-2006 Planning Commission Meeting
>
Rezoning in the Rural Residential District to the Rural Residential Classification
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2016 11:08:57 AM
Creation date
6/28/2016 11:08:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Findings: The Staff provides the following findings of fact for consideration by the <br /> Planning Commission: <br /> i. The rezoning to Rural Residential is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, <br /> which indicates that Rural Residential areas contain development patterns that are low- <br /> density residential, not served by municipal utilities, and containing limited demand for <br /> accessibility and new roads. <br /> 2. Neither the rezoning to Rural Residential nor to Shoreline is not consistent with the <br /> City's Future Land Use Map,which designates this area as future Forest Preservation. <br /> 3. The proposed rezoning to Rural Residential meets the compatibility requirements in that <br /> the property is established near Shoreline Residential uses. The Ordinance does not <br /> indicate whether the Rural Residential zone is compatible with the Shoreline <br /> Commercial zone. <br /> 4. The rezoning to Shoreline Commercial is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, <br /> which contains the goal of maintaining private resorts and facilities for public <br /> recreational use(p.65). <br /> 5. The property does not meet the minimum lot size of 5 acres for the Rural Residential <br /> zone,being just under one acre in size. <br /> 6. The property was recently purchased by the adjacent Wilderness Point Resort, with the <br /> intent of combining the property with the resort. <br /> 7. The property, on its own, does not meet the minimum buildable lot size of 2.5 acres for <br /> the Shoreline Commercial district,but combined with the surrounding resort properties <br /> to which it is planned to join, the resort parcel as a whole exceeds this lot size <br /> requirement. <br /> 8. The property,on its own, does not meet the minimum shoreline width requirements,but <br /> in combination with the existing resort parcel, the resort as a whole far exceeds the <br /> minimum shoreline width of 300 feet. <br /> 9. Rezoning this property to Shoreline Commercial would not constitute a down-zoning as <br /> this property was zoned Rural Residential under the previous Ordinance. <br /> Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission can recommend that the City <br /> Council approve,deny,or table this rezoning. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Based on the findings of fact presented in this report, the Staff <br /> recommends that the property in question be rezoned to Shoreline Commercial. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 8-3 <br /> December i4,2oo6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.