My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning & Zoning Monthly Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2007
>
10 -02-2007 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning & Zoning Monthly Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2016 3:01:32 PM
Creation date
6/27/2016 3:01:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ruud acknowledged that he and Westwood were aware of the 30-foot setback from <br /> the bluff. Mr. Ruud told Westwood where to put the house on the site plan. <br /> The Ridgley's thought they were doing something good by removing the cabin that is 40 <br /> feet from the lake. <br /> In response to a question from the audience,the rules for moving a dwelling in another <br /> zoning classification are not the same as in the Shoreline Residential zoning <br /> classification. <br /> Mrs. Ridgley stated she had difficulty understanding why a co would lie. Mr. <br /> Ruud stated that LisaBeth never said she would guarantee a ce,but said she would <br /> support it. He also asked if there was some way to make s <br /> Mr. Adams stated that the size of the home would a uilding ope,but maybe <br /> not in the desired location. Mr. Ridgley had a c t of the proposed h d used it to <br /> demonstrate that the house would possibly fit the b ' ding envelop e. retaining <br /> walls shown on the site plan exist and still serve a os portable fi ouse <br /> shown on the site plan is used each winter. <br /> The 30-foot setback is from either the a top oft e bluff is an 18% slope <br /> in 25 feet. <br /> Mr. Ruud thought a wal ko was a good u o e 1 Williams verified that the <br /> shoreland rules were . he early 1 z 's; the Ci has not restricted building on <br /> this property since purc it in 1994. <br /> Architect design not sho . or si plan—will be determined by finished <br /> grade level wo uire r walls. Contours are missing on site plan. <br /> Buildin use as ed o plan would leave 4 feet of unstable fill at ground <br /> level a Planning ssio to see finished contours. The Planning <br /> Co i would like a belt elevation drawings and slopes. Repositioning the <br /> house co uce the v ce to 5 or 10 feet. <br /> Mr. Ruud state the ding plan and drainage plan is being done by a professional <br /> soils engineer. <br /> The septic system could be positioned within the bluff setback with no variance required. <br /> The Planning Commission would like to see the design. <br /> The Planning Commission stated that tabling this variance request does not infer approval <br /> later. <br /> The Planning Commission would like to see the following: <br /> 1. Ideally a five-foot encroachment(no more than ten) of the house in the bluff <br /> setback; <br /> Minutes 4 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> September 20, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.