My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.02 - Ordinance Amendment - ISTS
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2007
>
08-07-2007 Council Meeting
>
06.02 - Ordinance Amendment - ISTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2016 2:36:00 PM
Creation date
6/24/2016 2:35:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
bare ground. <br /> `— 3. Minimal methods of erosion control and sediment entrapment have been <br /> employed. <br /> 4. There are no indications that any fill has been brought to the site. <br /> 5. The grading has not involved slopes of 30%or greater. <br /> 6. There are no bluff impact zones on the property. <br /> 7. There is no fill that has been placed below the OHW. <br /> 8. There has been no excavation in the bed of a public water. <br /> 9. The proposed excavation would be accessory to the existing dwelling, which <br /> is a permitted use. <br /> 10. The screening within the shore impact zone on the has been reduced. <br /> 11. The proposed patio would create impervious c ge within 50 feet of the <br /> OHW. <br /> 12. Grading up to fifty cubic yards in the shorel se a conditional use in <br /> the Shoreline Residential zone. <br /> 13. The work that has been performed is ensive, has not be ormed using <br /> Best Management Practices and g ly doe of conform to 't of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan, which em es eland man ement and <br /> environmental protection. <br /> 14. The use, with the reco ended conditio compatible with the existing <br /> neighborhood. <br /> 15. The use, in its current state, al erosio ction and is a threat to <br /> the lake water quality. Ade to ve no een taken to address this <br /> �• condition. <br /> 16. The gradin n, along the re I ion in screening that has taken <br /> place, is 4 er propert on the lake. <br /> 17. There acant : perties in th ediate vicinity of this property. <br /> 18. The public enforc ent costs, but no costs for public <br /> ture o line s proposal. <br /> r stion t a concern in relation to the shoreland grading. <br /> The gradin 1 not a demand for off-street parking. <br /> dequate in es ha not been taken to control nuisances related to the <br /> erty. <br /> 22. ut some r oration,the Conditional Use will result in the degradation of <br /> the ine. <br /> 23. Condit pproval are necessary to control pollution from the property. <br /> subject to the follo ng conditions: <br /> 1. The requested patio is denied and shall not be constructed in any form. There <br /> shall be no impervious coverage created between the dwelling and the lake. <br /> 2. A silt fence, fully trenched and properly installed, shall be erected along the <br /> shoreline for the entire length of the grading operation. The fence shall <br /> remain until the site is completely restored. <br /> 3. The material excavated between the house and the lake shall be restored, with <br /> the exception of a four foot wide walkway on the lake-side of the house that is <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 2 <br /> July 19, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.