Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Report,January 2007 Page 2 of 2 <br /> 5. Rezoning the two properties to Rural Residential would not be consistent with the <br /> previous zoning classification of Residential, as the minimum lot size and dimension <br /> standards would increase. <br /> 6. The properties do not meet the minimum lot size of five acres for the Rural Residential <br /> district, being 3.6 and 1.4 acres each. These lots would be considered non-conforming <br /> under this zoning classification. <br /> 7. Because of the odd shapes of the properties, neither one meets the minimum lot width <br /> requirement of Zoo feet for the Rural Residential zone. Both properties, however, are <br /> more than 200 feet wide at their widest points. <br /> 8. Rezoning to Rural Residential would meet the compatibility requirements for the zone, <br /> as the zone would be established next to the Shoreline Residential zone and the Rural <br /> Residential zone. <br /> If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact one of us. You can reach us <br /> by phone at (218) 828-3o64 or by email at marohn(@communitygrowth.net or <br /> barajas P communitgrowth.net. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> COMMUNITY GROWTH INSTITUTE <br /> LisaBeth Barajas&Charles Marohn,PE <br /> City Planners <br /> CC: Planning Commission <br /> Sandy Peine, City Clerk <br /> Dawn Bittner,Zoning Administrator <br /> 14084 Baxter Drive, Suite 7 1 Baxter, Minnesota 56425 1 218.828.3064 1 www.communitygrowth.com <br />