Laserfiche WebLink
fencing or other means as approved by the City. Trails should not be <br /> constructed over the treatment areas. <br /> d. The City may wish to require a copy of the sewage pumping contract <br /> between the association and their pumper/maintenance contractor, and <br /> maintenance records on an annual or bi-annual basis. <br /> e. All piping/collection systems must meet the requirements of the <br /> Minnesota Plumbing Code, and include cleanouts at the required intervals, <br /> minimum slope, size of pipe,pipe materials, etc. <br /> The applicant has modified the sewage treatment system plans to provide for the <br /> Phase 2 treatment field to be relocated 20-feet from Lot 0 and 10 feet from the <br /> top of the bluff. „ <br /> 5. The applicant has not complied with all con s and requirements of <br /> preliminary approval. Outstanding concerns fro ate ttorney remain. <br /> 6. The Final Plat has been prepared in agreement the pry nary plat. <br /> 7. The title work has been provided and is bem r ye ed by in ty Attorney. <br /> 8. There are no required improvements d therefore no fins al security is <br /> necessary. i <br /> 9. An independent land surveyor has conc €1 tha a final document meets the <br /> \1. <br /> statutory requirements. <br /> subject to the following conditions: \' y <br /> IND , <br /> 1. Homeowners association doc sfacto to <br /> \ \\ ry �cry Attorney. <br /> 2. Copies of all exhibits are attache o th� :....... ations <br /> 3. The applicant shall concur to have t �,\tl bn space lot, rezoned to Open <br /> Space consiste �� use and in';.: ion of thy`ot�prior to the recording of the <br /> document. ,jo <br /> All members vot ' a Mott-,-n carried. <br /> ,0 <br /> N. <br /> Park Dedic brow, agaYr. arohn checked the Ordinance and stated <br /> A\\ <br /> that the P2 o s a endation to the Planning Commission. The Planning <br /> Co „ on acts on lats;` j arang Park Dedication. <br /> Mr. Pede as prepare 0 dis bite the recommendation of the Park Board for a Park <br /> Dedication � of$55,900. He asked if the City had a capital improvement budget on <br /> parks and open � ,,,e. Will out one,there are no legal grounds to make a Park Dedication <br /> Fee. Staff stated t as not qualified to answer this question. She would need to <br /> check with the Ci \\ <br /> ty �,��rk. Mr. Marohn stated that there is a trail plan included in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. Demand for parks is driven by growth and development,thus the <br /> purpose of a Park Dedication Fee. <br /> Mr. Pederson passed out a handout. Previous plats with Park Dedication Fees were <br /> discussed. Staff was directed to re-evaluate the Park Dedication for Trailside Estates and <br /> bring back to the Planning Commission in February. <br /> Planning Commission Minutes 3 <br /> January 18, 2007 <br />