8A - Minutes 081706 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I 1. All three proposed lots meet the minimum buildable lot size of 6,250 square feet for the Urban Residential zone, each having over 9,200 square feet of area. The land is able to be built upon with minimum alteration required. 2. The property currently contains a dwelling and two sheds. The existing house would fall on the lot line between the proposed Lots 1 and 2 and would need to be removed. The larger shed is currently located on the western portion of the proposed Lot 1 and extends somewhat into the adjacent right-of-way. This structure would also need to be removed or relocated. 3. All three proposed lots have access to municipal sewer. 4. The property is not along a shoreline and so provisions for water-based recreation are not proposed with this development. 5. Each lot is larger than the minimum buildable area and has more than the minimum lot width of 50 feet as required by ordinance. Each lot contains ample space for the construction of dwellings that would meet all required setbacks. 6. The proposed lot layouts are compatible with existing development in the area and will not negatively impact future development in the area. The surrounding area is already platted, except the Cemetery land to the east. 7. The lot lines are straight and join existing lot lines at right angles. 8. Each lot exceeds the minimum amount of required right-of-way frontage, 33 feet, with Lot 1 having 68 feet of frontage on Oak Street, and Lots 2 and 3 each having 66 feet of frontage. subject to the following: 1. The existing dwelling is removed prior to construction of any new structures. 2. The existing non-conforming shed, currently located on the west property line of the proposed Lot 1, shall be removed or relocated so that it conforms to all required setbacks. All members voted"aye". Motion carried. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO AGENDA: Mr. Adams stated that structure height in the Shoreline Residential zone should be addressed when the Planning Commission discusses accessory structure maximum square footage. It seems the Variance granted to Mr. Ritter did not allow him to have the size door he needed. Mr. Marohn explained the definition of building height and Mr. Adams was going to contact Mr. Ritter. OPEN FORUM: None. FUTURE ROAD PLAN: Mr. Marohn explained the Staff Report and explained that he compared the Road Plan with the Comprehensive Plan and recommended that any road plan adopted should be amended into the Transportation Section of the Comprehensive Plan. The differences Planning Commission Minutes 13 August 17,2006