Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Findings: The Staff provides the following findings of fact for consideration by the <br /> Planning Commission: <br /> i. Lot i,the Greden property, is currently developed as Linger Longer Lodge. Lots 2 and 3 <br /> are currently developed as residential properties. <br /> 2. The Future Land Use Map designates all three properties as future Shoreline Residential <br /> and describes the future land use in this category as "residential consistent with state <br /> shoreline development standards." Rezoning any of these properties to Shoreline <br /> Commercial or Shoreline Residential would not be in conflict with the Future Land Use <br /> Map, particularly because the Map does not specifically designate shoreline commercial <br /> districts. � ) <br /> Lots i and 2 are proposed to be rezoned to Shoreline Resii tial; however Lot 1 is <br /> currently developed in a commercial nature and may be better suited under a Shoreline <br /> Commercial designation. <br /> 4. Lot 3 has already been rezoned to Shoreline Co4mial. This property, however, is <br /> currently developed as a single-family residential property. <br /> 5. Lots 2 and 3 meet the minimum lot size and width standards for the Shoreline <br /> Residential zoning district, both having more than one acre of area and having more <br /> than ioo feet of shoreline at the OHW and the building line. <br /> 6. Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot size of 2.5 acres for the Shoreline Commercial zone, <br /> being approximately 1.7 acres in size. The property is also does not meet the minimum <br /> lot width of 300 feet,being roughly 200 feet wide. <br /> 7. Rezoning Lot i to Shoreline Residential would make the existing resort a non- <br /> conforming use in the zoning district as resorts are specifically excluded from the <br /> Shoreline Residential District. <br /> 8. Should Lot 1 be rezoned to Shoreline Commercial,the existing resort would not be non- <br /> conforming, as resorts are listed conditional uses in this zone. The property would be <br /> `.w considered a non-conforming property due to lot size,though. <br /> ORezoning Lots 2 and 3 to Shoreline Residential would meet the compatibility <br /> requirements for that zone,being that they both are adjacent to a lake and are developed <br /> as residential properties. <br /> �Rezoning Lot 1 to Shoreline Commercial fulfills the purpose and intent of that zoning <br /> classification in that is maintains a zoning classification for existing commercial, <br /> recreationally oriented uses within the shoreland area. <br /> Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission can recommend that the City <br /> Council approve,deny,or table this rezoning. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Based on the findings of fact presented in this report, the Staff <br /> recommends that Lot i (Greden, Parcel # 291160010o1000g) be rezoned to Shoreline <br /> Commercial and Lots 2 (Kellogg, Parcel # 291160010020oog) and 3 (Calhoun, Parcel # <br /> 291160010030009) be rezoned to Shoreline Residential. The Shoreline Commercial district is <br /> specifically intended for existing commercial uses in shoreline areas and the Shoreline <br /> Residential classification would constitute a down-zoning of Lot 1. <br /> While Lots 2 and 3 were previously zoned Waterfront Commercial (along with the properties to <br /> the north), these properties have all been developed as individual residential properties. As <br /> such,they do not fulfill the purpose and intent of the Shoreline Commercial district. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 2-3 <br /> September 21,2006 <br />