11 - P&Z Admin Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

preserve 10.94 acres of open space which should reduce the physical and aesthetic impacts of the increased density on the property. 3. The land is suitable for development without significant alterations to accommodate the construction associated with the proposed development. No delineated wetlands exist on the proposed development site. 4. Much of the shoreline properties along the Pequot Lakes portion of the Sibley Lake shoreline have been platted and many of those properties have been developed. In the immediate vicinity of the subject property, the proposed development would unlikely conflict with the character of adjacent properties. 5. Most undeveloped land exists to the north of the proposed development. This land is platted, however remains undeveloped with the exception of a few homes. Properties to the east and west of the proposed development are developed with single-family homes each located on roughly 2-acre lots. 6. This property measures 15.34 acres and has approximately 475 feet of shoreline. + On the Density Calculations for a Planned Unit Development 1. The development proposes three tiers of development from Sibley Lake. Allowable Suitable Units (w/ Proposed Tier Total Area Area multiplier) Units One 93,657 58,168 7 2 Two 223,835 218,828 17.5 6 Three 281,879 253,169 21 6 TOTAL 599,371 530,165 45.5 14 + On the Design Criteria for a Planned Unit Development 1. A vegetative buffer of at least 50 feet is proposed along the entire PUD site area. There are no units or impervious surfaces proposed within this buffer. The applicant has not indicated the type of vegetation within the buffer area other than what currently exists on the property. 2. The applicant proposes to preserve 71% of the property as open space, exceeding the minimum Ordinance requirement of 25%. 3. The common space requirements and limitations have been met except for requirement 6 which states that the developer must preserve common space with restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means. The applicant has not submitted draft covenants for the common space. 4. The applicant has not yet submitted a stormwater management plan and has only submitted a general erosion control plan at this time. These documents will be reviewed by the City to ensure that, when implemented,