My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A - Wetland Fill Permitting
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2006
>
05-18-2006 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8A - Wetland Fill Permitting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2016 11:13:03 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 11:13:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SWCD and other agencies.As the LGU,the City has the capability to do so,and also the latitude <br /> to be more restrictive or require other permits if they deem it necessary. The Planning <br /> Commission should discuss this issue and decide how to deal with wetlands filling that fall <br /> under this de minimis exemption.The following should be considered: <br /> i. If the Wetland Conservation Act, and the local permitting agencies, do not require a <br /> permit for projects that fall under these exemptions,should the wetland fill be: <br /> a. Allowed without a permit? <br /> b. Permitted? <br /> c. Prohibited altogether? <br /> 2. If the fill is to be permitted,what type of permit should be obtained? <br /> a. Over-the-counter? <br /> b. Conditional use? <br /> If the Planning Commission should decide to move forward with requiring a permitting process, <br /> the Staff would recommend that the sequencing standards that are required for non-exempt fill <br /> projects be followed,at a minimum.Those include the following: <br /> i. Avoidance—Pre-application meeting would be highly recommended to work with the <br /> applicant to avoid wetland grading or filling altogether.Avoiding wetland impacts would <br /> be the first priority in any project. <br /> 2. Minimization—If it has been agreed that avoidance cannot be achieved,wetland impacts <br /> should be minimized.This can be achieved through the appropriate placement of the <br /> project,reducing the size of a project,or changing the design for the project. <br /> 3. Mitigation/Replacement—If avoidance cannot be achieved,replacement and mitigation <br /> efforts are required along with minimization.Replacement can be done through <br /> purchase in a wetlands bank,creating a new wetland elsewhere,or making payment to <br /> \.. the local water protection program,for example. <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 13-2 <br /> May i8,2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.